Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Demography. 2015 Jun;52(3):905–918. doi: 10.1007/s13524-015-0385-2

Table 2.

Cragg Tobit alternative (two-tier) models: Time engaged with children in two-parent families

Minutes With Children % Nonwork Time With Children

Probability of Time With Children Minutes Conditional on Any Time Probability of Time With Children % of Time With Children Conditional on Any Time
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Panel A. Respondent Partnership Type (ref. = women with different-sex partners)
 Women with same-sex partners 0.65* (0.27) 55.68 (101.87) 0.65* (0.27) 4.05 (5.23)
 Men with same-sex partners 0.08 (0.45) −28.37 (143.98) 0.08 (0.45) −3.36 (7.43)
 Men with different-sex partners −0.48*** (0.02) −77.47*** (13.13) −0.48*** (0.02) −3.62*** (0.67)
Panel B. Respondent Partnership Type (ref. = men with different sex partners)
 Women with same-sex partners 1.13*** (0.27) 133.15 (102.25) 1.13*** (0.27) 7.67 (5.25)
 Men with same-sex partners 0.56 (0.45) 49.10 (144.12) 0.56 (0.45) 0.26 (7.43)
 Women with different-sex partners 0.48*** (0.02) 77.47*** (13.13) 0.48*** (0.02) 3.62*** (0.67)
Observations 44,188 44,188 44,188 44,188

Notes: Robust standard errors are shown in parentheses. Model controls for respondent’s educational attainment, employment, age, race/ethnicity, whether respondent is a student, respondent’s partner’s education and employment, family income, children in the household (number, age, and gender), whether respondent lives in a metropolitan area, geographic region, and time-diary characteristics (weekend, summer month, year, and holiday).

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001