Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 12;10(6):e0129479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129479

Table 4. Pearson correlation and p-values between beak dimensions corrected for beak length and safety factors extracted from the different models.

bottom keratin thickness / beak length top keratin thickness / beak length beak depth / beak length beak width / beak length
safety factor base biting 0.80 (p = 0.001) 0.25 (p = 0.40) 0.71 (p = 0.006) 0.68 (p = 0.011)
safety factor tip biting 0.90 (p < 0.001) 0.65 (p = 0.015) 0.88 (p < 0.001) 0.88 (p < 0.001)

Bold values illustrate significant correlations (p<0.05/4, Bonferroni correction) between safety factors and anatomical features.