Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 12;10(6):e0129479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129479

Table 5. In vivo measured bite force (6 species, means ± standard deviations, N = number of specimens) compared with the model bite force and the model safety factors (SF).

behavior Measured force at base (N) Measured force at tip (N) Model force at base (N) Model force at tip (N) Model base biting SF Model tip biting SF
G. fortis Base crush 23 ± 9 (N = 382) 19 ± 7 (N = 382) 30 22 1.6 1.0
G. magnirostris (N = 29) Base crush 65 ± 17 (N = 29) 44 ± 10 (N = 29) 58 42 1.1 0.7
G. fuliginosa (N = 115) Base crsuh 5.5 ± 1.9 (N = 115) 4.6 ± 1.6 (N = 115) 7.1 4.6 2.5 1.6
G. conirostris (*) Probe & crush 15 10 1.1 1.0
G. scandens (N = 64) Probe & crush 10 ± 3 (N = 64) 7 ± 3 (N = 64) 8.9 6.1 2.0 1.3
G. difficilis Probe & crush 3.6 2.4 2.1 2.3
C. olivacea (N = 18) Probe 2.0 ± 0.5 (N = 18) 1.2 ± 0.4 (N = 18) 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.4
C. parvulus (N = 29) Tip crush 5.6 ± 1.3 (N = 29) 4.2 ± 1.2 (N = 29) 3.4 2.2 2.1 1.8

(* Juvenile data)