Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 1;8(4):3892–3900.

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors associated with survival

Variables OS

Univariate Multivariate

P value P value HR 95% CI
TMA assays (n=298)
Sex (female vs. male) 0.704 NA
Age, years (≤ 50 vs. > 50) 0.917 NA
HBsAg (negative vs. positive) 0.093 NS
AFP, ng/ml (≤ 20 vs. > 20) 0.009 NS
γ-GT, U/L (≤ 54 vs. > 54) 0.006 NS
Liver cirrhosis (no vs. yes) 0.991 NA
Tumor size, cm (≤ 5 vs. > 5) 0.000 0.000 3.542 2.437~5.149
Tumor number (single vs. multiple) 0.189 0.005 1.916 1.221~3.007
Encapsulation (complete vs. none) 0.078 NA
Microvascular invasion (no vs. yes) 0.001 NS
Tumor differentiation (I-II vs. III-IV) 0.012 0.014 1.598 1.100~2.321
TNM stage (I vs. II III) 0.001 NS
LOXL4 (Low vs. High) 0.001 0.003 0.568 0.392~0.823

Abbreviations: OS, overall survival; AFP: α-fetoprotein; γ-GT, γ-glutamyl transferase; TNM, tumor-nodes-metastasis; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidential interval; NA, not adopted. Boldface type indicates significant values. †Cox proportional hazards regression. a. Degree of freedom reduced because of constant or linearly dependent covariates.