Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 12;10(6):e0129473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129473

Table 3. LCA model parameters and goodness of fit.

Condition Subject β κ s I 0 m -LL c 2 (1, N = 29) p
“Pre” 1 0.282 0.133 1.528 0.646 0.837 73.041 3.78 1.000
2 0.497 0.020 1.696 -0.021 0.806 74.444 7.70 1.000
3 0.436 0.028 2.379 -0.055 0.767 70.6333 7.17 1.000
4 0.270 0.557 1.909 -0.064 0.381 88.095 6.03 1.000
5 0.359 0.006 0.929 0.129 0.883 100.468 10.87 0.999
“Post” 1 0.126 0.090 2.403 0.507 0.985 61.137 4.33 1.000
2 0.019 0.036 2.613 0.858 1.033 62.749 4.69 1.000
3 0.061 0.063 9.181 1.125 1.371 40.263 2.06 1.000
4 0.173 0.123 0.532 0.818 0.591 96.489 15.19 0.989
5 0.257 0.110 2.178 0.484 1.083 76.182 6.17 1.000
6 0.772 0.002 1.680 -0.237 0.732 61.299 3.79 1.000
“Fixed” 1 0.155 0.084 1.025 0.403 0.728 83.117 17.68 0.951
2 0.179 0.011 1.622 -0.136 0.663 74.168 4.86 0.999
3 0.176 0.093 1.449 0.456 0.672 65.839 8.25 0.999
6 0.447 0.046 2.739 0.118 1.012 64.579 10.80 0.999

Parameters: inhibition β, leak k, sensitivity s, baseline activity (I 0) and coherence saturation (m). See Materials for description of the meaning of these parameters.-LL, χ 2 and p are the negative log likelihood of the best-fitting parameters, the chi-square value and the p-value respectively.