Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 16;2(4):342–348. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.55

Table 2.

Comparison and Summary of Dolutegravir Pharmacokinetic Parameters and Unbound Concentrations

Parameter Hepatic Impaired (Dolutegravir 50 mg, n = 8)a Healthy (Dolutegravir 50 mg, n = 8)a Hepatic Impaired vs. Healthy, GLS Mean Ratio (90% CI)b
Cmax, µg/mL 1.18 (0.29) 1.97 (0.86) 1.02 (0.754, 1.37)
C24, µg/mL 0.62 (0.26) 0.61 (0.22) 1.04 (0.727, 1.48)
AUC(0–∞), µg h/mL 40.0 (13.0) 40.3 (15.1) 1.05 (0.745, 1.49)
CL/F, L/h 1.34 (0.36) 1.48 (0.77) 0.950 (0.673, 1.34)
Vz/F, L 29.4 (5.11) 31.6 (14.8) 0.986 (0.737, 1.32)
t1/2, h 15.8 (3.11) 15.3 (3.93) 1.04 (0.845, 1.27)
tmax, h 4.00 (2.0–5.0) 3.00 (1.0–4.0) 1.00 (−0.500, 2.50)
Unbound dolutegravir concentration at 3 h, ng/mL 8.38 (3.22) 4.51 (2.44) 2.062 (1.404, 3.029)
Unbound dolutegravir concentration at 24 h, ng/mL 2.49 (0.58) 1.19 (0.75) 1.483 (1.217, 1.807)
Unbound fraction at 3 h, % 0.54 (0.19) 0.23 (0.04) 2.20 (1.62, 2.99)
Unbound fraction at 24 h, % 0.44 (0.14) 0.23 (0.03) 1.76 (1.23, 2.51)

AUC(0–∞), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity; C24, concentration at 24 hours post-dose; CI, confidence interval; CL/F, apparent oral clearance; Cmax, maximum observed plasma concentration; GLS, geometric least squares; t1/2, half-life; Tmax, time to Cmax; Vz/F, apparent volume of distribution after extravascular administration.

a

Data are arithmetic mean and standard deviation, except for Tmax, which is median (range).

b

Data are GLS mean ratio (90% CI) except for Tmax, which is Hodges–Lehmann estimate of difference (90% CI).