Table 1.
Characteristics of the studies included in the systematic review
| Study | Design | Setting | Participants | N | Interventions | Evaluations | Comparator group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kluger et al.8 | Prospective cohort | Military | Students of CTLS course Military physicians, dissimilar experience, different training levels |
77 | 1 – Videos, wound moulage 2 – LTT (details not reported) |
Pre- and posttraining | No control |
| Jacobs et al.9 | Prospective cohort | Civilian | Students of DSTC course PGY-4, PGY-5, fellows and junior attendings |
15 | 1 – Interactive CD-ROM 2 – Anesthetized swine |
Pre- and posttraining | No control |
| Jacobs et al.10 | Prospective cohort | Civilian | Students of ATOM course Traumatologists, general surgeons, trauma fellows, PGY-4 and 5 general surgery residents |
50 | 1 – Anesthetized swine | Pre- and posttraining | No control |
| Gaarder et al.11 | Prospective cohort | Military | 67% (n = 95) general surgeons > 4y of experience 33% (n = 49) < 4y of experience |
144 | 1 – Anesthetized swine inflicted by a GSW to the abdomen and to the thigh | Pre- and posttraining | No control |
| Bowyer et al.12 | Randomized controlled trial | Civilian | Third-year medical students No expertise in DPL |
40 | 1 – Graphical user interface simulator 2 – Anesthetized swine 3 – HPS |
Pre- and posttraining | Computer simulator |
| King et al.13 | Prospective cohort | Military | General and orthopedic surgeons, nurses, OR technicians, ED technicians | 304 | 1 – Anesthetized swine | Pre- and posttraining | No control |
| Tugnoli et al.14 | Prospective cohort | Civilian | Residents and general surgeons Level of training not reported |
126 | 1 – Anesthetized swine | Posttraining | No control |
| Sohn et al.15 | Prospective cohort | Military | Soldiers deploying to combat operations Level of training not reported |
1317 | 1 – HPS 2 – Anesthetized goats |
Pre- and posttraining | No control |
| Sohn et al.16 | Prospective cohort | Military | Non-surgical graduating residents (internists, gynecologists and obstetricians) | 60 | 1 – HPS 2 – Anesthetized swine |
Pre- and posttraining | No control |
| Rubiano et al.17 | Prospective cohort | Military | Combat nurses, MEDTAC course in Colombia Level of training not reported |
374 | 1 – HPS 2 – LTT (both not described in details) |
Pre- and posttraining | No control |
| Hall18 | Randomized controlled trial | Military | Air force volunteers with no prior medical training | 24 | 1 – HPS 2 – Anesthetized swine |
Posttraining | HPS |
| McLaughlin et al.19 | Prospective cohort | Military | Physicians (general practitioners and surgeons), nurses, physicians assistants and medical technicians Level of training not reported |
124 | 1 – HPS 2 – LTT (no details reported) 3 – Cadaveric models |
Posttraining | No control |
ATOM = Acute Trauma Operative Management; CTLS = Combat Trauma Life Support; DPL = diagnostic peritoneal lavage; DSTC = Definitive Surgical Trauma Care; ED = emergency department; GSW = gunshot wound; HPS = human patient simulation; LTT = live tissue training; MEDTAC = combat tactical medicine course; OR = operating room; PGY = postgraduate year.