Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 4;13:180. doi: 10.1186/s12967-015-0535-8

Table 9.

Analyses of IL-2, IFN-γ and TGF-β expression in LLABCs pre NAC and post NAC

Cytokines Groups Pre NAC Post NAC
Low/negative expression (n) High expression (n) Pearson Chi Square value (GPR versus PPR, PCR versus non PCR) P value Low/negative expression (n) High expression (n) Pearson Chi Square value (GPR versus PPR, PCR versus non PCR) P value
IL-2 (n = 16) Good pathological response (GPR, n = 9) 3 6 0.042 0.838 5 4 1.667 0.197
Poor pathological response (PPR, n = 7) 2 5 6 1
Pathological complete response (PCR, n = 6) 2 4 0.019 0.889 3 3 1.571 0.210
Non pathological complete response (Non PCR, n = 10) 3 7 8 2
IFN-γ (n = 16) Good pathological response (GPR, n = 9) 0 9 2.939 0.086 4 5 0.423 0.515
Poor pathological response (PPR, n = 7) 2 5 2 5
Pathological complete response (PCR, n = 6) 0 6 1.371 0.242 2 4 0.71 0.790
Non pathological complete response (Non PCR, n = 10) 2 8 4 6
TGF-βa (n = 16) Good pathological response (GPR, n = 9) 6 3 0.907 0.341 5 4 2.861 0.091
Poor pathological response (PPR, n = 7) 3 4 1 6
Pathological complete response (PCR, n = 6) 4 2 0.423 0.515 4 2 3.484 0.062
Non pathological complete response (Non PCR, n = 10) 5 5 2 8

LLABCs large (≥3 cm) and locally advanced breast cancers (T3–4 N1–2 M0), NAC neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

aTGF-β was scored as negative and positive.