Table 9.
Cytokines | Groups | Pre NAC | Post NAC | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Low/negative expression (n) | High expression (n) | Pearson Chi Square value (GPR versus PPR, PCR versus non PCR) | P value | Low/negative expression (n) | High expression (n) | Pearson Chi Square value (GPR versus PPR, PCR versus non PCR) | P value | ||
IL-2 (n = 16) | Good pathological response (GPR, n = 9) | 3 | 6 | 0.042 | 0.838 | 5 | 4 | 1.667 | 0.197 |
Poor pathological response (PPR, n = 7) | 2 | 5 | 6 | 1 | |||||
Pathological complete response (PCR, n = 6) | 2 | 4 | 0.019 | 0.889 | 3 | 3 | 1.571 | 0.210 | |
Non pathological complete response (Non PCR, n = 10) | 3 | 7 | 8 | 2 | |||||
IFN-γ (n = 16) | Good pathological response (GPR, n = 9) | 0 | 9 | 2.939 | 0.086 | 4 | 5 | 0.423 | 0.515 |
Poor pathological response (PPR, n = 7) | 2 | 5 | 2 | 5 | |||||
Pathological complete response (PCR, n = 6) | 0 | 6 | 1.371 | 0.242 | 2 | 4 | 0.71 | 0.790 | |
Non pathological complete response (Non PCR, n = 10) | 2 | 8 | 4 | 6 | |||||
TGF-βa (n = 16) | Good pathological response (GPR, n = 9) | 6 | 3 | 0.907 | 0.341 | 5 | 4 | 2.861 | 0.091 |
Poor pathological response (PPR, n = 7) | 3 | 4 | 1 | 6 | |||||
Pathological complete response (PCR, n = 6) | 4 | 2 | 0.423 | 0.515 | 4 | 2 | 3.484 | 0.062 | |
Non pathological complete response (Non PCR, n = 10) | 5 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
LLABCs large (≥3 cm) and locally advanced breast cancers (T3–4 N1–2 M0), NAC neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
aTGF-β was scored as negative and positive.