Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 8;8:1291–1313. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S73924

Table 4.

Comparison of meta-analysis results on diagnostic efficacy between CT and MRI

Unit Variable Number detected SEN (95% CI) SPE (95% CI) AUC (SE) Q* (SE)
Node CT 2,483 0.77 (0.73–0.87) 0.85 (0.84–0.87) 0.8429 (0.0341) 0.7745 (0.0318)
MRI 7,100 0.72 (0.70–0.74) 0.84 (0.83–0.85) 0.9054 (0.0198) 0.8371 (0.0215)
P 0.0176 0.2739 0.1098 0.1262
Neck level CT 1,665 0.84 (0.75–0.84) 0.72 (0.69–0.74) 0.8787 (0.0268) 0.8091 (0.0270)
MRI 4,022 0.80 (0.77–0.82) 0.81 (0.80–0.82) 0.8860 (0.0262) 0.8165 (0.0269)
P 1.0000 0.0000 0.8689 0.8702
Patient CT 230 0.67 (0.52–0.80) 0.74 (0.68–0.81) 0.6860 (0.0815) 0.6418 (0.0643)
MRI 716 0.78 (0.70–0.81) 0.76 (0.72–0.80) 0.8631 (0.0437) 0.7937 (0.0424)
P 0.1992 0.6161 0.0491 0.0683

Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; SE, standard error; CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; SEN, sensitivity; SPE, specificity.