Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Control Release. 2005 Dec 2;110(3):587–594. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.10.029

Table 2.

Pharmacological availability of various ILPs administered orally to Wistar rats

Dose Preparation AAC PA



(IU/kg) (% glu. reduc. · h) (%)
10 Insulin solution *graphic file with name nihms696039t1.jpg 0.7 ± 0.6 **graphic file with name nihms696039t2.jpg *graphic file with name nihms696039t1.jpg 0 **graphic file with name nihms696039t2.jpg
L-ILP 19.0 ± 16.6 3.3 ± 2.9
SS-ILP 54.6 ± 11.6 9.5 ± 2.0
25 Insulin solution *graphic file with name nihms696039t1.jpg 1.3 ± 0.8 **graphic file with name nihms696039t2.jpg *graphic file with name nihms696039t1.jpg 0 **graphic file with name nihms696039t2.jpg
L-ILP 4.7 ± 3.2 0.3 ± 0.2
SS-ILP 106.1 ± 47.3 7.4 ± 3.3
50 Insulin solution *graphic file with name nihms696039t1.jpg 1.7 ± 1.2 **graphic file with name nihms696039t2.jpg *graphic file with name nihms696039t1.jpg 0 **graphic file with name nihms696039t2.jpg
L-ILP 14.3 ± 9.9 0.5 ± 0.3
SS-ILP 51.5 ± 10.3 1.8 ± 0.3

AAC denotes area above the curve.

PA denotes relative pharmacological availability.

Each value represents mean ± S.E.

Statistically significant difference between the preparation: p <0.01, **;

p <0.05, *.