Table 2.
Pharmacological availability of various ILPs administered orally to Wistar rats
Dose | Preparation | AAC | PA | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(IU/kg) | (% glu. reduc. · h) | (%) | |||||
10 | Insulin solution |
*![]() |
0.7 ± 0.6 |
**![]() |
*![]() |
0 |
**![]() |
L-ILP | 19.0 ± 16.6 | 3.3 ± 2.9 | |||||
SS-ILP | 54.6 ± 11.6 | 9.5 ± 2.0 | |||||
25 | Insulin solution |
*![]() |
1.3 ± 0.8 |
**![]() |
*![]() |
0 |
**![]() |
L-ILP | 4.7 ± 3.2 | 0.3 ± 0.2 | |||||
SS-ILP | 106.1 ± 47.3 | 7.4 ± 3.3 | |||||
50 | Insulin solution |
*![]() |
1.7 ± 1.2 |
**![]() |
*![]() |
0 |
**![]() |
L-ILP | 14.3 ± 9.9 | 0.5 ± 0.3 | |||||
SS-ILP | 51.5 ± 10.3 | 1.8 ± 0.3 |
AAC denotes area above the curve.
PA denotes relative pharmacological availability.
Each value represents mean ± S.E.
Statistically significant difference between the preparation: p <0.01, **;
p <0.05, *.