Table 2.
Contingency Table Analyses for Perpetration Tactic.
| Perpetration tactic | Committed relationship with sexual precedence (n = 99) |
Committed relationship without sexual precedence (n = 29) |
Casual relationship with sexual precedence (n = 40) |
Casual relationship without sexual precedence (n = 36) |
Total within perpetration tactic (n = 204) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%)a | n (%)a | n (%)a | n (%)a | n (%)b | |
| Showed displeasure | 61 (62) | 14 (48) | 19 (48) | 10 (28) | 104 (51) |
| Used continual arguments and pressure | 22 (22) | 12 (42) | 11 (27) | 11 (31) | 56 (27) |
| Gave woman alcohol or drugs | 6 (6) | 2 (7) | 6 (15) | 8 (22) | 22 (11) |
| Took advantage of an incapacitated woman | 8 (8) | 1 (3) | 2 (5) | 7 (19) | 18 (9) |
| Threatened or used physical force | 2 (2) | 0 (0) | 2 (5) | 0 (0) | 4 (2) |
a
Percentage represents within the relationship and sexual precedence subgroup.
b
Percentage represents within all perpetration tactics.