Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 5;124(7):1047–1055. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-01-548941

Table 3.

Confirmed or unconfirmed best responses to ixazomib by investigator assessment

Response Dose-escalation cohorts (n = 23) Expansion cohorts (n = 30*) Total (N = 50)
Best response, n (%)
 CR 0 0 0
 PR 2 (9) 8 (27) 9 (18)
  VGPR 1 (4) 0 1 (2)
 MR 0 1 (3) 1 (2)
 SD 7 (30) 9 (30) 15 (30)
 PD 14 (61) 12 (40) 25 (50)
Response rates, n (%) (95% CI)
 CR+VGPR 1 (4) (<1, 22) 0 1 (2) (<1, 11)
 ≥PR 2 (9) (1, 28) 8 (27) (12, 46) 9 (18) (9, 31)
 ≥MR 2 (9) (1, 28) 9 (30) (15, 49) 10 (20) (10, 34)

CR, complete response; PD, progressive disease; VPGR, very good partial response.

*

Includes 3 patients from the MTD dose-escalation cohort.

2 PRs unconfirmed; 1 PR unconfirmed but confirmed as MR. Responses were seen across the expansion cohorts, including 2, 3, 1, and 2 PRs in the relapsed and refractory, bortezomib-relapsed, PI-naive, and prior carfilzomib cohorts, respectively.