Abstract
Spinel-type oxides are technologically important in many fields, including electronics, magnetism, catalysis and electrochemical energy storage and conversion. Typically, these materials are prepared by conventional ceramic routes that are energy consuming and offer limited control over shape and size. Moreover, for mixed-metal oxide spinels (for example, CoxMn3−xO4), the crystallographic phase sensitively correlates with the metal ratio, posing great challenges to synthesize active product with simultaneously tuned phase and composition. Here we report a general synthesis of ultrasmall cobalt manganese spinels with tailored structural symmetry and composition through facile solution-based oxidation–precipitation and insertion–crystallization process at modest condition. As an example application, the nanocrystalline spinels catalyse the oxygen reduction/evolution reactions, showing phase and composition co-dependent performance. Furthermore, the mild synthetic strategy allows the formation of homogeneous and strongly coupled spinel/carbon nanocomposites, which exhibit comparable activity but superior durability to Pt/C and serve as efficient catalysts to build rechargeable Zn–air and Li–air batteries.
It is challenging to synthesize cobalt manganese spinels with controlled phase and composition. Here the authors present a solution-based synthesis method for the spinels, which show potential in catalysing oxygen reduction reactions.
Spinel-type compounds with the general formula of AB2X4 (A, B=metal, X=chalcogen) have attracted extensive interest because of their diverse properties and wide applications in electronics, catalysis, magnetism and electrochemical technologies such as batteries, fuel cells and electrolysers1,2,3,4. Spinels are traditionally synthesized through solid-state methods involving grinding and firing the mixtures of the corresponding metal oxides, nitrates or carbonates5,6, which require elevated temperature and prolonged time to overcome the reaction energy barriers7. The prepared spinels often show irregular shape, large particle size and low surface area, seriously affecting their physicochemical properties. Continuous efforts have been dedicated to developing alternative mild synthetic strategies such as hydro/solvothermal route8, sol–gel method9 and carbonate co-precipitation10. However, it remains challenging to prepare homogenous and ultrasmall nanocrystalline spinels under mild conditions.
As a typical mixed transition metal spinel, cobalt manganese oxides (Co3−xMnxO4±δ) have versatile applications as lithium storage electrode, catalysts and magnetic materials8,9,10,11,12. The rational preparation of cobalt manganese spinels is made complex by different structural variations multiple oxidation states and elusive distribution of cations. Moreover, the crystallographic phases of Co3−xMnxO4 are sensitively determined by the Co/Mn ratio, namely, high Mn content (1.9<x≤3) tends to form the tetragonal phase while low proportions of Mn (0≤x≤1.3) result in the cubic spinel at room temperature8,11. The Mn-enriched cubic spinel (x=1.8) is observed at temperature around 998 K but is not stable at low temperature and immediately transforms into the tetragonal structure when quenching13. There seems to be a compositional limit to obtaining single cubic or tetragonal spinel phase at mild conditions. Theoretically, the lattice distortion caused by Jahn–Teller effect of Mn3+ (3d4) in octahedral interstices is responsible for the lowering of crystallographic symmetry from cubic to tetragonal phases14,15. If the cation Mn3+ concentration is low enough (≤60–65%), Jahn–Teller distortion would not be prominent and the spinels could exist in cubic form16. Therefore, it is feasible but remains a great challenge to rationally synthesize Co–Mn spinels with controlled phase over a wide composition range, which is highly desired in structure-sensitive applications.
The catalytic oxygen reduction/evolution reactions (ORR/OER) determine performance of different electrochemical devices, including fuel cells, metal–air batteries and direct solar or electricity-driven water splitting17,18,19. Noble metal and alloys are the most active oxygen electrocatalysts20, but are expensive and scarce. Substantial efforts have been dedicated to improving the performance of Pt-based catalysts with minimal Pt loading21,22,23,24 or developing alternative catalysts based on non-noble elements25,26,27,28,29,30. Multivalent metal spinels, Co3−xMnxO4±δ in particular, are considered as attractive non-precious oxygen electrocatalysts8,11,29. However, the structure–properties relationship of spinel metal oxides remains elusive and their catalytic performances are limited relative to their Pt-based counterparts, because of low electrical conductivity and poor O2-binding and -activating ability.
To develop efficient mixed 3d–metal–spinel catalysts with the above factors in mind, we describe herein a unique strategy for the rational synthesis of nanocrystalline Co3−xMnxO4 (1≤x≤2) as well as NiCo2O4, FeCo2O4, ZnCo2O4 and ZnMn2O4. This solution-based synthesis involves oxidizing precipitation of Mn/Co salts in air atmosphere and subsequent crystallization into spinels at mild temperature (180 °C). The approach yields ∼10 nm cobalt–manganese oxide (CoMnO) spinels with independently tunable crystallographic phase (cubic or tetragonal form) and Co/Mn ratio, which is—to our knowledge—the first report of structural control over a wide compositional range of spinel (Co3−xMnxO4). In this case, the tetragonal form is extended in a composition range of 1≤x≤3, while the cubic symmetry is attainable within 0≤x≤2. The selective synthesis also allows the first systematical investigation of structure–performance correlation for CoMnO spinel electrocatalysts. We show that a cubic phase and a high Mn concentration in CoMnO spinels favour intrinsic ORR activity. We demonstrate that the nanocrystalline cubic spinel firmly supported on carbon manifests comparable ORR current and potential, but significantly better stability as compared with the commercial Pt/C catalyst. Furthermore, the spinel-based electrocatalyst is catalytically efficient in air electrodes of rechargeable Zn–air and Li–air batteries.
Results
Synthesis and characterization of nanocrystalline spinels
As schematically shown in Fig. 1a,b, the rational synthesis proceeds through two steps, namely, a room-temperature oxidation precipitation of Mn2+/Co2+ with NH3·H2O in air followed by a crystallization of spinel phase with cation redistribution on heating at 180 °C. We achieve phase selection by simply altering the adding order of reactants in the first step. To obtain a cubic spinel, aqueous Mn2+ is dripped into a solution containing Co2+ and NH3·H2O; the formation of tetragonal spinel follows reversely dripping Co2+ solution in a mixture of Mn2+ and NH3·H2O. We attain compositional control by adjusting the molar ratio of Co/Mn precursors. Three representative compositions (Co:Mn=1:2, 1:1 and 2:1) in both cubic (c-) and tetragonal (t-) phases afford a batch of six spinel samples, which are designated as c-CoMn2, c-CoMn, c-Co2Mn, t-CoMn2, t-CoMn and t-Co2Mn, respectively.
Figure 2a,b and Supplementary Fig. 1 display the X-ray diffraction patterns of the as-synthesized samples with the corresponding Rietveld refinement. The peak positions of Co-rich spinels shift to higher angles in both cubic and tetragonal phases (Fig. 2a). Reflection peaks of the cubic series (Fig. 2b; Supplementary Fig. 1a) are indexable to the space group Fd-3m (no.227) and consistent with the standard values of face-centered cubic phase (Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards, JCPDS card no. 23-1237), while the pattern of the tetragonal series (Fig. 2b; Supplementary Fig. 1b) can be readily assigned to body-centered tetragonal spinel (space group I41/amd no. 141, JCPDS card no. 77-0471). The refined profiles match well with the experimental data and suggest the formation of spinel structure with cation or anion deficiency (Supplementary Tables 1–6; Supplementary Note 1). The slightly shifted diffraction peaks and decreased cell parameters of Co-rich oxides are ascribed to substitution of smaller Co3+ ions (radius rCo3+=0.545 Å) for Mn3+ (rMn3+=0.645 Å) on the octahedral sites. In comparison with spinels prepared from conventional ceramic routes, the c-series have a shrunken lattice, whereas the t-series possess larger cell parameters due to the presence of abundant ionic vacancies13,31.
Typical scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images (Supplementary Fig. 2) show nanoparticulate morphology of the prepared spinel samples. As shown in transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images (Fig. 3a,b; Supplementary Fig. 3), the aggregated particles are composed of small nanocrystals having comparable mass-average particle sizes near 10 nm (Supplementary Fig. 4; Supplementary Note 2). The clear lattice fringes observed in high-resolution TEM and the corresponding fast Fourier transform (FFT) diffraction pattern (Fig. 3c,d) reveal the crystallinity and structural symmetry of the synthesized spinels. The interlayer spacing and well-defined points in FFT patterns coincide with the allowed Bragg diffraction of the corresponding cubic and tetragonal spinels, which agree with the X-ray diffraction analysis. Moreover, energy-dispersive spectra (EDS, Supplementary Fig. 5) and elemental analysis from atomic absorption spectroscopy confirm the compositional ratio of CoMn2, CoMn and Co2Mn spinel compounds.
Synchrotron X-ray absorption spectroscopy analysis was performed to determine the oxidation states of mixed metals in the synthesized spinels32. Figure 4a,b illustrates the Co and Mn K-edge X-ray absorption near-edge structure profiles. The reference cobalt and manganese oxides are also listed and used to establish the linear correlation between the K-edge excitation energy and the metal valence33. Accordingly, the mean Co valence was determined to be 2.25 for c-CoMn2, t-CoMn2 and t-CoMn and 2.38 for c-CoMn, c-Co2Mn and t-Co2Mn (Fig. 4c). A lower Co valence value tends to appear in oxides with lower Co content, suggesting an increase in the ratio of Co2+/Co3+ due to substitution of Mn cations8. As for Mn (Fig. 4d), the estimated average oxidation states of the cubic group (3.49, 3.45 and 3.28 for c-CoMn2, CoMn and Co2Mn) are obviously higher than those of the tetragonal group (2.84, 2.76 and 2.67 for t-CoMn2, CoMn and Co2Mn). Spectra of Co and Mn L-edge further confirm close Co electronic structure but dissimilar Mn valence (Supplementary Fig. 6). The different Mn oxidation states in the spinels are also verified by their thermal behaviours in air (Supplementary Fig. 7), where the mass loss of cubic phase within a moderate temperature range (250–800 °C) exceeds that of the corresponding tetragonal phase with the same composition. This difference implies more Mn4+ reduction to Mn3+ and higher Mn valence34 in cubic spinels than in tetragonal oxides.
The above results indicate controllable synthesis of cubic/tetragonal spinel phase in an unprecedented wide composition of (Co3−xMnxO4, 1≤x≤2). Notably, to our knowledge, cubic CoMn2O4 and tetragonal Co2MnO4 have never been obtained at mild temperatures. To elucidate the formation mechanism of unusual phase, we have analysed the intermediate species during the synthesis (Supplementary Fig. 8). In preparation of cubic spinels, oxygen from air first oxidizes Co(NH3)62+ to Co(NH3)63+ in solution containing Co2+ and NH3·H2O 35. After dripping Mn2+, MnOOH forms immediately and is gradually oxidized to cubic Mn7O13 in Co(NH3)63+, as evidenced by ex situ X-ray diffraction analysis of the precipitate and colour change of the solution (Supplementary Figs 8 and 9). The oxidative precipitation of Mn2+ to manganite is well known in alkaline solution exposed to air36, while the redox reaction (7MnOOH+5Co(NH3)63++5OH−→Mn7O13+5Co(NH3)62++6H2O, standard Gibbs free energy change -139.53 kJ mol−1) is also thermodynamically favourable (Supplementary Note 3). The cubic crystal structure and high Mn valence of intermediate Mn7O13 (Supplementary Fig. 10) are responsible for the phase speciation of cubic spinel after crystallization on heating. In the synthesis of tetragonal spinels, the main precipitated intermediate is MnOOH, which adopts tetragonal lattice with Mn(III) cations that tend to distort in lower crystallographic symmetry37.
Because the present synthesis of CoMnO spinels proceeds at relatively low temperature (180 °C), the product features small particle size and high specific surface area. The obtained c-CoMn2, c-CoMn, c-Co2Mn, t-CoMn2, t-CoMn and t-Co2Mn spinels have Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface areas of 84, 114, 110, 100, 79 and 73 m2 g−1 (Supplementary Fig. 11), respectively, which are obviously higher than those of CoMnO spinel powders prepared using the conventional high-temperature ceramic method29 (Supplementary Fig. 12). The mild synthesis results in abundant ionic deficiency and low crystallinity, which can be enhanced by annealing (Supplementary Fig. 13). Thermal treatment also induces lower Mn valence as well as larger cell parameter and increased average metal–oxygen bond length in octahedron (Supplementary Table 7). Of particulate note, the unusual c-CoMn2 and t-Co2Mn spinels undergo cubic≤tetragonal transition at high temperature (Supplementary Fig. 14), which is consistent with previous report13 and suggests that c-CoMn2 and t-Co2Mn are metastable. These results demonstrate the successful simultaneous control of crystallographic symmetry and composition of CoMnO spinels.
Electrocatalytic ORR properties of CoMnO spinels
The controllable preparation of CoMnO spinels series permits a systematical investigation of their structure–performance relationship towards the oxygen electrocatalysis. Figure 5 shows the ORR catalytic properties of the nanocrystalline spinels supported on rotational glass-carbon electrodes. The polarization profiles (Fig. 5a) display typical ORR current-potential response21,22,23, by subtracting the voltammograms in Ar. There emerges a mixed kinetic diffusion-controlled region at 0.9–0.5 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode and a subsequent oxygen-transport-limited current (Id), which increases with electrode-rotating rates (Supplementary Fig. 15). The catalytic activities of the spinels can be accessed directly by the onset and half-wave potentials. Evidently, the cubic spinel outperforms the corresponding tetragonal phase having the same composition, while for either cubic or tetragonal structures, the activities decrease with Co:Mn ratio, following an order of CoMn2>CoMn>Co2Mn. The different performance can be also viewed from the required potentials to reach a given kinetic current (Ik) or the Ik values at a given potential (Fig. 5b).
Further evaluation of the ORR catalytic behaviours is performed by determining the transferred electron number (n), and yield of peroxide species from the disk and ring currents recorded on rotational disk–ring electrodes (Fig. 5c; Supplementary Fig. 16; Supplementary Note 4). Below 0.55 V, n is above 3.60, which coincides with the results based on Koutecky–Levich8,28 plots (Supplementary Fig. 15; Supplementary Note 5) and suggests an apparent quasi-4e− ORR pathway. A comparison of determined n values for six nanocrystalline spinels demonstreates the superiority of cubic phase and high Mn content. In addition, two Tafel slopes observed at high and low overpotentials imply similar reaction mechanism and rate-determining step for all spinels (Fig. 5d), in accordance with previously reported manganese oxide electrocatalysts38. Again, the activities of different spinels are distinguishable by the overpotential and kinetic current density. It is deserved to note that the ORR activities of synthesized nanocrystalline CoMnO spinel surpass that of the counterparts prepared using high-temperature ceramic method (Supplementary Fig. 17); this superiority could be mainly ascribed to the smaller crystalline size and higher specific surface areas. Besides, the obtained spinel renders respectable catalytic capability in neutral (KCl solution) or nonaqueous (ether-based electrolyte) media (Supplementary Fig. 18).
Supplementary Table 8 summarizes the ORR electrocatalytic characteristics (for example, onset and half-wave potentials, transferred electron number and kinetic currents normalized by mass or specific surface areas) of the spinel series, indicating structure and composition co-dependent behaviour. Specifically, cubic phase and higher Mn/Co ratio are more favourable in intrinsic activity. In alkaline media, the ORR electrocatalysis on transition metal oxides is proposed to involve multistep steps of O2 adsorption, formation of an HO2− intermediate and further reduction or decomposition of peroxide to OH− ions28. These processes are mediated by electron transfer and redox reactions of metal-containing species, and strongly related to the number of available active sites and the surface oxygen adsorption ability that can be tuned by electronic structure38,39. Following this mechanistic consideration, the structure–property correlation of CoMnO spinels can be understood as follows. First, cubic spinel surfaces provide more catalytic sites number and bind O2 more strongly than the tetragonal phase, as previously demonstrated29. The slightly stronger interaction between cubic spinel and adsorbed oxygen is verified here by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Supplementary Fig. 19). Second, the cubic phases feature a higher average oxidation state of Mn (>3), which exists in a mixed form of Mn3+ and Mn4+ cations. The presence of multivalent 3d metals would benefit electron conduction (by hopping) and charge transfer (through redox reactions), thus favouring the electrocatalysis40. The electrical conductivity of neat c-CoMn2 is 1.01 S m−1, a value at least three orders of magnitude higher than that of the binary Co3O4 and Mn3O4 spinels (Supplementary Fig. 20). Third, the composition-dependent kinetics is interpretable by the factor that Co(II) is less active than Mn species8. Furthermore, based on O K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy analysis (Supplementary Fig. 6), we find a moderate affinity between surface metal cation and absorbed oxygen-containing species in both c-CoMn2 and t-CoMn2 spinels, which would facilitate the rate-limiting steps of hydroxide/peroxide displacement and regeneration during the ORR28.
Application of carbon-supported CoMnO spinels
Our one-pot synthesis offers a simple, general and in situ approach to fabricate mixed-metal oxide supported on conducting substrate composite materials with high electronic conductivity and uniformly distributed active sites. Here we show an example of the hybrid (Supplementary Fig. 21) comprising the most active c-CoMn2 spinel and Carbot Vulcan XC-72 carbon (a widely used electrocatalyst support29), which is abbreviated as c-CoMn2/C. TEM image (Fig. 6a) of the composite reveals that c-CoMn2 nanoparticles are uniformly dispersed on the carbon support with firm attachment. The composition of the hybrid can be easily adjusted and a ∼30 wt% spinel is found to attain the best ORR activity (Supplementary Fig. 22).
The as-synthesized c-CoMn2/C composite delivers significantly enhanced ORR and OER performance as compared with the physical mixture of two components (Fig. 6b). More surprisingly, the ORR activity of the hybrid rivals that of the benchmark Pt/C catalyst (30 wt% Pt nanoparticles supported on Vulcan XC-72 carbon, Supplementary Fig. 23); for the OER the former far exceeds the latter. The similar fitted K–L plots (Fig. 6c) and determined electron transfer number and percentage of peroxide (Fig. 6d) also demonstrate the comparable catalytic performance between the hybrid and Pt/C. In addition, the calculated ORR turnover frequency (Supplementary Note 6) at 0.80 V is 0.69, 1.07 and 0.07 s−1 for Pt/C, c-CoMn2/C, and the physical mixture, respectively. The key performance parameters such as onset potential, half-wave potential, kinetic current density and electron transfer number of c-CoMn2/C are among the most active non-noble metal electrocatalysts reported so far8,27,28,29,41 (Supplementary Table 9). Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (Supplementary Fig. 24) shows much lower charge transfer resistance on c-CoMn2/C than on c-CoMn2+C mixture, which is likely an attribution to the faster ORR kinetics of the in situ generated hybrid. Apart from high activity, c-CoMn2/C exhibits remarkable catalytic stability. In a continuous chronoamperometric period of 50 h, the retention of ORR current on c-CoMn2/C sustains >91.5%, significantly higher than that of Pt/C (71.6%) (Fig. 6e). The morphology of the hybrid remains almost unchanged even after repeated 12,000 cyclic voltammograms, whereas Pt nanoparticles agglomerate severely in Pt/C (Supplementary Fig. 25), indicating considerable structural robustness of c-CoMn2/C. The superior performance of the hybrid possibly arises from several factors: (1) the intrinsic high activity of c-CoMn2 spinel (Supplementary Table 8); (2) the high dispersion, small size of nanocrystalline spinel; and (3) the strong coupling effect between the spinel oxide and the carbon substrate functionalized with nitrogen groups, as evidenced by XPS results (Supplementary Fig. 26). The firm contact of spinel and carbon in the in situ fabricated hybrid also favours enhanced electrical conductivity in comparison with the physical mixture (Supplementary Fig. 20).
The superb electrocatalytic performance of synthesized c-CoMn2/C has motivated us to investigate its applicability in metal–air battery devices. The assembled primary Zn–air cells exhibit stable galvanostatic discharge curves, giving a high energy density of ∼650 Wh kg−1 at 10 mA cm−2 normalized to consumed Zn anode (Supplementary Fig. 27). More interestingly, the constructed cells show exceptional rechargeability at a shallow discharge/charge state (Fig. 6f). Due to the superior bifunctinal ORR/OER capability and durability, the c-CoMn2/C composite electrocatalyst enables lower discharge/charge overpotential and more stable voltage plateau on cycling, as compared to that of Pt/C. For c-CoMn2/C-based cell, the average voltage of discharge platform decreases by 8.5% after 155 cycles, half that of Pt/C (17.6%). The variation of charging potential for c-CoMn2/C electrode is negligible, whereas the Pt/C-based cell suffers a increase of 14.4%. Furthermore, the spinel-based cathode applied in lithium–air cells delivers high capacity and encouraging cyclability up to dozens of cycles (Supplementary Fig. 28). These results suggest that the c-CoMn2/C nanocomposite is an effective, yet durable catalyst for catalysing dual ORR and OER in rechargeable metal–air batteries.
Discussion
We have synthesized nanocrystalline cobalt–manganese spinel oxides with simultaneously controllable phase and composition using a facile oxidation–precipitation and crystallization route. The synthesis allows tuning the cubic and tetragonal crystallographic symmetry of spinel over an unprecedented wide compositional range (Co3−xMnxO4, 1≤x≤2) at mild temperature and room atmosphere. The obtained spinel family is featured by variable metal valence, small particle size, high specific surface areas and abundant ionic defects. It deserves to note that this solution-based synthetic strategy can be extended to the preparation of other technologically important nanocrystalline spinel oxides such as NiCo2O4, FeCo2O4, ZnCo2O4 and ZnMn2O4 at temperatures below 200 °C (Supplementary Fig. 29), although the structural symmetry control of these spinels has not been attained possibly owing to the limit of valence tunability and the strong lattice-site preference of Ni, Fe and Zn relative to Co and Mn.
When employed as electrocatalysts for the ORR in alkaline media, the as-synthesized spinel nanocrystallines outperform the high-temperature powders. The intrinsic electrocatalytic activity of CoMnO family correlates with the crystal phase, Co/Mn composition and surface valence value that affect the extent of O2 activation and number of available active sites. Furthermore, the solution-based synthesis at mild temperatures enables in situ, firmly dispersing ultrafine spinel nanoparticles on conducting substrates such as carbon. The optimized c-CoMn2/C hybrid manifests similar ORR performance and superior catalytic durability to that of the counterpart Pt/C catalyst. The c-CoMn2/C nanocomposite is also active for the OER, rendering bifunctional electrocatalytic capability. These results would shed light on rational design and preparation of spinel oxides and broaden their applications, for example, as efficient catalysts for oxygen-relevant energy storage technologies including rechargeable metal–air batteries and regenerative fuel cells.
Methods
Synthesis
In a typical synthesis of cubic nanocrystalline CoMn2 spinel, 4 ml aqueous ammonia (25 wt%) was first dropped into 5 ml 0.2 mol l−1 Co(NO3)2 solution under constant stirring at room temperature. Then, 10 ml of 0.2 mol l−1 Mn(NO3)2 solution was added to the mixture, which was stirred for 120 min. Afterwards, the mixture was evaporated and nitrates were fully decomposed by heating at 180 °C for 40 min, yielding cubic CoMn2. Similarly, cubic CoMn and Co2Mn samples were obtained by adopting the corresponding stoichiometric amount of cobalt and manganese sources, respectively. In preparation of tetragonal CoMn2, 4 ml aqueous ammonia (25 wt%) was dropped into 10 ml 0.2 mol l−1 Mn(NO3)2 solution, subsequently followed by addition of 5 ml 0.2 mol l−1 Co(NO3)2 aqueous solution, water evaporation and heating. Likewise, tetragonal CoMn and Co2Mn spinels were synthesized by adjusting the Co:Mn molar ratio. The spinel/carbon hybrid was obtained by simply dispersing desired amount of carbon powders in the aqueous Co/Mn salt solution.
Characterization
Powder X-ray diffraction patterns were collected on a Rigaku MiniFlex600 X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation. The X-ray diffraction data was refined by the RIETAN-2,000 Rietveld refinement program42. SEM images were taken with a JEOL JSM-7500F microscope (operating voltage, 5 kV) equipped with an EDS analyzer. TEM and high-resolution TEM imaging was obtained on Philips Tecnai G2 F20 (acceleration voltage, 200 kV). Chemical composition was determined by EDS and atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS, Hitachi 180-90 spectrophotometer). Surface areas were calculated from the N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms at 77 K on BELsorp-Mini. Thermogravimetric analysis was carried out on a Netzsch STA 449 F3 Jupiter analyzer. XPS was performed by a Perkin Elmer PHI 1,600 ESCA system. The X-ray absorption near-edge structure spectra were collected on BL14W1 beamline of Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF) and analysed with software of Ifeffit Athena.
Electrochemical test
Electrochemical tests were performed using a standard three-electrode electrochemical cell comprising a saturated calomel reference electrode, a platinum foil counter electrode and a glass-carbon working electrode coated with catalyst. The fabrication of working electrode followed similar procedures described previously40. Typically, a mixture of 1.5 mg spinels and 3.5 mg carbon powder (Vulcan XC-72) or 5 mg c-CoMn2/C hybrid was dispersed in solvent containing 0.5 ml water, 0.5 ml isopropyl alcohol and 17.5 μl neutralized Nafion solution (5 wt%, Sigma-Aldrich). After thorough sonication, 4.6 μl of the formed catalyst ink was pipetted on the glassy carbon electrode, which was air-dried to afford a mass loading of ∼0.054 mgoxide cm−2. The electrolyte was 0.1 M aqueous KOH, 0.1 M KCl and 1.0 M lithium bis(trifluoromethane) sulfonamide (LiTFSI) in tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether (TEGDME) in the case of alkaline, neutral and aprotic media, respectively. The electrolyte was purged with O2 for 30 min before each measurement and subjected to O2 flow during the tests. Electrochemical data were recorded at room temperature on a PARSTAT 263 A workstation accompanied with a model 636 system (AMETEK). The voltammetry was collected at a potential scan rate of 5 mV s−1. The polarization voltammograms in O2-saturated electrolyte have been corrected by subtracting the background current recorded in Ar-saturated electrolyte. All potentials were calibrated with reference to standard reversible hydrogen electrode. Electrochemical impedance spectra were conducted on PARSTAT 4,000 (AMETEK) with a frequency range of 100 kHz–100 mHz. The Li–air and Zn–air cells were assembled with a Li or Zn anode, a spinel catalyst-based cathode and a LiTFSI/TEGDME or KOH electrolyte. Battery performance testing was conducted on a LAND-CT2001A system at room temperature.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Li, C. et al. Phase and composition controllable synthesis of cobalt manganese spinel nanoparticles towards efficient oxygen electrocatalysis. Nat. Commun. 6:7345 doi: 10.1038/ncomms8345 (2015).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Programs of 973 (2011CB935900), NSFC (21231005 and 21322101) and 111 Project (B12015 and IRT13R30). We thank Professor Xiaosong Liu for fruitful discussion on the results of synchrotron X-ray absorption spectroscopy.
Footnotes
Author contributions C.L., F.C. and J.C. conceived and designed this work. C.L. conducted the synthesis, C.L., X.H. and Y.H. carried out the characterization and the electrochemical measurements. X.H., F.C. and C.J. co-wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the data and commented on the manuscript. J.C. directed the research.
References
- Yamasaki Y. et al. Magnetic reversal of the ferroelectric polarization in a multiferroic spinel oxide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 207204 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hemberger J. et al. Relaxor ferroelectricity and colossal magnetocapacitive coupling in ferromagnetic CdCr2S4. Nature 434, 364–367 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xie X. W. et al. Low-temperature oxidation of CO catalysed by Co3O4 nanorods. Nature 458, 746–749 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thackeray M. M. Manganese oxides for lithium batteries. Prog. Solid State Chem. 25, 1–71 (1997). [Google Scholar]
- Armijo J. S. The kinetics and mechanism of solid-state spinel formation—A review and critique. Oxid. Met. 1, 171–198 (1969). [Google Scholar]
- Lu J. et al. Effectively suppressing dissolution of manganese from spinel lithium manganate via a nanoscale surface-doping approach. Nat. Commun. 5, 5693 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stein A., Keller S. W. & Mallouk T. E. Turning down the heat: design and mechanism in solid-state synthesis. Science 259, 1558–1564 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liang Y. Y. et al. Covalent hybrid of spinel manganese–cobalt oxide and graphene as advanced oxygen reduction electrocatalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 3517–3523 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lavela P., Tirado J. L. & Vidal-Abarca C. Sol-gel preparation of cobalt manganese mixed oxides for their use as electrode materials in lithium cells. Electrochim. Acta 52, 7986–7995 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- Zhou L., Zhao D. & Lou X. W. Double-shelled CoMn2O4 hollow microcubes as high-capacity anodes for lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 24, 745–748 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rios E., Gautier J. L., Poillerat G. & Chartier P. Mixed valency spinel oxides of transition metals and electrocatalysis: case of the MnxCo3−xO4 system. Electrochim. Acta 44, 1491–1497 (1998). [Google Scholar]
- Habjanič J. et al. A 3D oxalate-based network as a precursor for the CoMn2O4 spinel: synthesis and structural and magnetic studies. Inorg. Chem. 53, 9633–9643 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vila E., Rojas R. M., Martín de Vidales J. L. & García-Martínez O. Structural and thermal properties of the tetragonal cobalt manganese spinels MnxCo3-xO4 (1.4<x<2.0). Chem. Mater. 8, 1078–1083 (1996). [Google Scholar]
- Goodenough J., Wold A., Arnott R. & Menyuk N. Relationship between crystal symmetry and magnetic properties of ionic compounds containing Mn3+. Phys. Rev. 124, 373–384 (1961). [Google Scholar]
- Goodenough J. & Loeb A. Theory of ionic ordering, crystal distortion, and magnetic exchange due to covalent forces in spinels. Phys. Rev. 98, 391–408 (1955). [Google Scholar]
- Buhl R. Manganites spinelles purs d'elements de transition preparations et structures cristallographiques. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 30, 805–812 (1969). [Google Scholar]
- Bruce P. G., Freunberger S. A., Hardwick L. J. & Tarascon J. M. Li–O2 and Li–S batteries with high energy storage. Nat. Mater. 11, 19–29 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Malavasi L., Fisher C. A. J. & Islam M. S. Oxide-ion and proton conducting electrolyte materials for clean energy applications: structural and mechanistic features. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 4370–4387 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kinoshita K. Electrochemical Oxygen Technology Wiley (1992). [Google Scholar]
- Debe M. K. Electrocatalyst approaches and challenges for automotive fuel cells. Nature 486, 43–51 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamamoto K. et al. Size-specific catalytic activity of platinum clusters enhances oxygen reduction reactions. Nat. Chem 1, 397–402 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen C. et al. Highly crystalline multimetallic nanoframes with three-dimensional electrocatalytic surfaces. Science 343, 1339–1343 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Greeley J. et al. Alloys of platinum and early transition metals as oxygen reduction electrocatalysts. Nat. Chem. 1, 552–556 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strasser P. et al. Lattice-strain control of the activity in dealloyed core–shell fuel cell catalysts. Nat. Chem. 2, 454–460 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bashyam R. & Zelenay P. A class of non-precious metal composite catalysts for fuel cells. Nature 443, 63–66 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liang Y. Y. et al. Co3O4 nanocrystals on graphene as a synergistic catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. Nat. Mater. 10, 780–786 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maiyalagan T. et al. Spinel-type lithium cobalt oxide as a bifunctional electrocatalyst for the oxygen evolution and oxygen reduction reactions. Nat. Commun. 5, 3949 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Suntivich J. et al. Design principles for oxygen reduction activity on perovskite oxide catalysts for fuel cells and metal air batteries. Nat. Chem. 3, 546–550 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng F. Y. et al. Rapid room-temperature synthesis of nanocrystalline spinels as oxygen reduction and evolution electrocatalysts. Nat. Chem. 3, 79–84 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang M., de Respinis M. & Frei H. Time-resolved observations of water oxidation intermediates on a cobalt oxide nanoparticle catalyst. Nat. Chem. 6, 362–367 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bordeneuve H. et al. Structure and electrical properties of single-phase cobalt manganese oxide spinels Mn3−xCoxO4 sintered classically and by spark plasma sintering (SPS). J. Solid State Chem. 182, 396–401 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- Hu Y. Y. et al. Origin of additional capacities in metal oxide lithium-ion battery electrodes. Nat. Mater. 12, 1130–1136 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiao F. & Frei H. Nanostructured manganese oxide clusters supported on mesoporous silica as efficient oxygen-evolving catalysts. Chem. Commun. 46, 2920–2922 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rojas R. M., Vila E., Garcia O. & de Vidales J. L. M. Thermal behaviour and reactivity of manganese cobaltites MnxCo3-xO4 (0.0<x<1.0) obtained at low temperature. J. Mater. Chem. 4, 1635–1639 (1994). [Google Scholar]
- Li Y. G., Tan B. & Wu Y. Y. Freestanding mesoporous quasi-single-crystalline Co3O4 nanowire arrays. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 14258–14259 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moore T. E., Ellis M. & Selwood P. W. Solid oxides and hydroxides of manganese. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 72, 856–866 (1950). [Google Scholar]
- Shoemaker D. P., Li J. & Seshadri R. Unraveling atomic positions in an oxide spinel with two Jahn−Teller ions: local structure investigation of CuMn2O4. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 11450–11457 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roche I., Chaînet E., Chatenet M. & Vondrák J. Carbon-supported manganese oxide nanoparticles as electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in alkaline medium: physical characterizations and ORR mechanism. J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 1434–1443 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- Oh S. H. et al. Synthesis of a metallic mesoporous pyrochlore as a catalyst for lithium–O2 batteries. Nat. Chem. 4, 1004–1010 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng F. Y. et al. Enhancing electrocatalytic oxygen reduction on MnO2 with vacancies. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 2474–2477 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- El-Deab M. S. & Ohsaka T. Manganese oxide nanoparticles electrodeposited on platinum are superior to platinum for oxygen reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 5963–5966 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Izumi F. & Ikeda T. A Rietveld-analysis program RIETAN-98 and its applications to zeolites. Mater. Sci. Forum 321–324, 198–203 (2000). [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.