Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 10;(12):1–65. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008090.pub2

Imbahale 2011a

Methods Study design: controlled time series Study location: Nyalenda, Kisumu County, Kenya Study dates: February 2008 to May 2008 Transmission intensity: not stated Malaria parasite species: not specified Primary vectors: An. gambiae Giles Breeding sites: man-made habitats (ponds or water canals) Baseline data: not recorded

Participants Not applicable

Interventions Fish species: G. affinis Indigenous fish species used: no Fish source: colony at KEMRI (Kenya Medical Research Institute) established from a wild-caught population provided by Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute (KEMFRI) Populated sites: man-made habitats; 30 pools (average 1 m × 1 m × 1 m deep) or water canals (15 m × 1 m × 0.3 m deep). Pond sites and water canal sites were constructed by people for the purposes of this experiment, so can be defined as "semi-field" studies Restocked: no (treatment arm: ponds fish once), fortnightly (treatment arms: pond fish only or water canal fish only) Co-interventions: Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis

Outcomes Density of early instars (L1 and L2) or late instars (L3 and L4) of anopheline mosquitoes Method: standard larval dipping procedure using 350 mL mosquito dipper (Bioquip, Gardena, CA, USA), maximum of 10 dips/habitat, estimated weekly

Source of funding The Dioraphte Foundation, The Netherlands

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement

Study design High risk Controlled time series study

Site selection Low risk "Thirty man-made habitats (1 m × 1 m × 1 m) were created as mosquito larval habitats"

Site allocation Unclear risk Unclear how treatment for each site was chosen for ponds. In water canals: "Six treatments were randomly administered in canal habitats"

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Unclear whether assessors were blinded to treatment

Baseline values Unclear risk Not reported

Number of sites High risk Number of sites may be inadequate: five sites per group