Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 20;2014(6):CD009135. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009135.pub2

Chappuis 2003.

Study characteristics
Patient sampling Consecutive and prospective enrolment of patients with suspected VL
Patient characteristics and setting Sample size: 195
Age (data available for 184 included participants): mean 23 years
Sex (data available for 184 included participants): 59% men
Presenting signs and symptoms: fever for 2 weeks or more and clinical splenomegaly
Frequency of VL: 76%
HIV: 0%
Clinical setting: tertiary care centre (B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences in Dharan)
Country: Nepal
Endemic Leishmania species:L. donovani
Index tests Type: rK39 immunochromatographic test; Brand: InSure Rapid Test for Visceral Leishmaniasis, InBios Interational, Washington, USA; Sample: serum
Target condition and reference standard(s) Target condition: clinical VL
Sample: bone marrow; if bone marrow negative and spleen aspiration possible: spleen
Technique: direct smear examination
Reference standard category: parasitology including spleen aspirate ‐ no serology
Flow and timing Eleven participants with an uncertain diagnosis were excluded.
Comparative  
Notes  
Methodological quality
Item Authors' judgement Risk of bias Applicability concerns
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? Yes    
Was a case‐control design avoided? Yes    
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Yes    
    Low Low
DOMAIN 2: Index Test All tests
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? Unclear    
    Unclear Low
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Unclear    
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? Unclear    
    Unclear Low
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Yes    
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? Yes    
Were all patients included in the analysis? Yes    
Did all patients receive a reference standard? Yes    
    Low