Chappuis 2003.
Study characteristics | |||
Patient sampling | Consecutive and prospective enrolment of patients with suspected VL | ||
Patient characteristics and setting |
Sample size: 195 Age (data available for 184 included participants): mean 23 years Sex (data available for 184 included participants): 59% men Presenting signs and symptoms: fever for 2 weeks or more and clinical splenomegaly Frequency of VL: 76% HIV: 0% Clinical setting: tertiary care centre (B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences in Dharan) Country: Nepal Endemic Leishmania species:L. donovani |
||
Index tests | Type: rK39 immunochromatographic test; Brand: InSure Rapid Test for Visceral Leishmaniasis, InBios Interational, Washington, USA; Sample: serum | ||
Target condition and reference standard(s) |
Target condition: clinical VL Sample: bone marrow; if bone marrow negative and spleen aspiration possible: spleen Technique: direct smear examination Reference standard category: parasitology including spleen aspirate ‐ no serology |
||
Flow and timing | Eleven participants with an uncertain diagnosis were excluded. | ||
Comparative | |||
Notes | |||
Methodological quality | |||
Item | Authors' judgement | Risk of bias | Applicability concerns |
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection | |||
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? | Yes | ||
Was a case‐control design avoided? | Yes | ||
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? | Yes | ||
Low | Low | ||
DOMAIN 2: Index Test All tests | |||
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? | Unclear | ||
Unclear | Low | ||
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard | |||
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? | Unclear | ||
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? | Unclear | ||
Unclear | Low | ||
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing | |||
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? | Yes | ||
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? | Yes | ||
Were all patients included in the analysis? | Yes | ||
Did all patients receive a reference standard? | Yes | ||
Low |