Kilic 2008.
Study characteristics | |||
Patient sampling | Consecutive enrolment of patients with suspected VL | ||
Patient characteristics and setting |
Sample size: 59 Age (data available for 24 VL patients): median age 7 years; 22/24 cases <14 years Sex: 71% men Presenting signs and symptoms: prolonged fever + splenomegaly or hepatomegaly + anaemia/pancytopenia Frequency of VL: 41% HIV: not reported Clinical setting: tertiary care centre Country: Turkey Endemic Leishmania species:L. infantum |
||
Index tests | Type: FAST; Brand: not applicable; Sample: serum | ||
Target condition and reference standard(s) |
Target condition: clinical VL Sample: bone marrow Technique: direct smear (Giemsa stain) and culture Reference standard category: parasitology not including spleen aspirate ‐ no serology |
||
Flow and timing | No information about exclusion | ||
Comparative | |||
Notes | |||
Methodological quality | |||
Item | Authors' judgement | Risk of bias | Applicability concerns |
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection | |||
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? | Unclear | ||
Was a case‐control design avoided? | Yes | ||
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? | Unclear | ||
Unclear | Low | ||
DOMAIN 2: Index Test All tests | |||
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? | Unclear | ||
Unclear | Low | ||
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard | |||
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? | No | ||
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? | Unclear | ||
High | Low | ||
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing | |||
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? | Yes | ||
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? | Yes | ||
Were all patients included in the analysis? | Unclear | ||
Did all patients receive a reference standard? | Yes | ||
Unclear |