Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 9;2013(12):CD008846. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008846.pub2

Malaria_Taiwan 1991 TWN.

Methods Dates of study: 1955
Location of study: Taiwan
Malaria endemicity (prevalence): 4.12% in all ages (May 1955 survey); 2.93% in all ages (November 1955) [Low]
Transmission season: Not described
Malaria species: P. falciparum, P. malariae, P. vivax
Vector species: A. maculatus, A. minimus, A. sinensis
Study design: Uncontrolled before‐and‐after study
Evaluation design: Cross‐sectional surveys and passive surveillance
Participants Age groups included: All ages, except infants
Sample size
Intervention group 1 mean (range): 1520 (1502‐1537)
Interventions Intervention group 1: MDA administered to all persons, except infants, in Lanyu with a single dose of chloroquine (12 mg/kg) in November 1955. Coverage not specified. Co‐intervention with IRS using DDT.
Outcomes Parasitaemia prevalence
No adverse event surveillance conducted
No adverse events reported
Notes Post‐MDA (> 12 months) estimated using survey data from April‐May 1957 and April 1960
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk No comparison group
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk No comparison group
Baseline imbalance (selection bias) High risk No comparison group
Contamination protection High risk No comparison group
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk No comparison group
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk No comparison group
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Insufficient reporting of attrition/exclusions to permit judgement
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk The first three malariometric baseline surveys reported consisted of only a portion of the entire population on the island. Subsequent surveys examined all inhabitants. While these disproportionate samples could result in a certain bias when compared to the remaining surveys that comprised the entire population, the investigators weighted the first three surveys according to the natural distribution of the population.
Other bias Low risk No other bias detected