Malaria_Taiwan 1991 TWN.
Methods | Dates of study: 1955 Location of study: Taiwan Malaria endemicity (prevalence): 4.12% in all ages (May 1955 survey); 2.93% in all ages (November 1955) [Low] Transmission season: Not described Malaria species: P. falciparum, P. malariae, P. vivax Vector species: A. maculatus, A. minimus, A. sinensis Study design: Uncontrolled before‐and‐after study Evaluation design: Cross‐sectional surveys and passive surveillance |
|
Participants | Age groups included: All ages, except infants Sample size Intervention group 1 mean (range): 1520 (1502‐1537) |
|
Interventions | Intervention group 1: MDA administered to all persons, except infants, in Lanyu with a single dose of chloroquine (12 mg/kg) in November 1955. Coverage not specified. Co‐intervention with IRS using DDT. | |
Outcomes | Parasitaemia prevalence No adverse event surveillance conducted No adverse events reported |
|
Notes | Post‐MDA (> 12 months) estimated using survey data from April‐May 1957 and April 1960 | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | High risk | No comparison group |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | No comparison group |
Baseline imbalance (selection bias) | High risk | No comparison group |
Contamination protection | High risk | No comparison group |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | No comparison group |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | No comparison group |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient reporting of attrition/exclusions to permit judgement |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | The first three malariometric baseline surveys reported consisted of only a portion of the entire population on the island. Subsequent surveys examined all inhabitants. While these disproportionate samples could result in a certain bias when compared to the remaining surveys that comprised the entire population, the investigators weighted the first three surveys according to the natural distribution of the population. |
Other bias | Low risk | No other bias detected |