Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 16.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2012 Aug 13;41(5):621–639. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2012.706517

Table 5.

Intervention effects: Subgroup with average and high baseline hopelessness

Measure Assessment Descriptive Statistics Comparison
PRP (A+AP)
Mean (SD)
Control
Mean (SD)
PRP vs Control
Depression (CDI)
Screening 14.37 (8.13) 13.14 (8.23)
N = 138 N = 70
Baseline 14.47 (8.62) 14.57 (9.46)
N = 138 N = 70
Post 11.16 (8.68) 13.25 (9.67) ANCOVA F(1,183) = 8.36, p=.004
N = 123 N = 64 d = 0.28 (0.09, 0.48)
Follow-up 9.75 (8.51) 11.77 (10.21) ANCOVA F(1,170) = 3.17, p=.077
N = 113 N = 61 d = 0.21 (−0.02, 0.44)
MM ANOVA t(181) = −2.84, p=.005
d = 0.37 (0.11, 0.63)
Depression (RADS-2)
Screening 70.00 (14.44) 66.60 (14.58)
N = 138 N = 70
Baseline 68.41 (16.51) 68.24 (17.99)
N = 138 N = 70
Post 60.95 (16.91) 64.31 (17.80) ANCOVA F(1,183) = 5.50, p=.020
N = 123 N = 64 d = 0.27 (0.04, 0.49)
Follow-up 58.62 (17.20) 61.81 (19.68) ANCOVA F(1,170) = 2.49, p=.117
N = 113 N = 61 d = 0.20 (−0.05, 0.45)
MM ANOVA t(184) = −2.21, p=.029
d = 0.31 (0.03, 0.57)
Anxiety (RCMAS)
Screening 14.77 (6.86) 14.31 (7.18)
N = 138 N = 70
Baseline 13.58 (7.08) 13.83 (8.24)
N = 138 N = 70
Post 10.82 (16.91) 12.50 (8.44) ANCOVA F(1,183 = 6.78, p=.010
N = 123 N = 64 d = 0.27 (0.07, 0.48)
Follow-up 9.91 (7.51) 10.83 (8.59) ANCOVA F(1,169) = 1.44, p=.231
N = 113 N = 60 d = 0.14 (−0.09, 0.38)
MM ANOVA t(184) = −2.13, p=.031
d = 0.30 (0.02, 0.57)
Explanatory style (CASQ-CN)
Baseline 9.34 (3.11) 9.35 (3.34)
N = 138 N = 70
Post 8.66 (3.72) 9.41 (3.87) ANCOVA --
N = 123 N = 64
Follow-up 8.42 (3.76) 8.78 (4.01) ANCOVA --
N = 113 N = 61
MM ANOVA t(183) = −1.05, p=.292
d = 0.14 (−0.12, 0.40)
Hopelessness (HSC)
Baseline 6.63 (2.61) 6.82 (3.08)
N = 138 N = 70
Post 4.93 (2.96) 6.21 (3.58) ANCOVA F(1,184) = 7.58, p=.007
N = 123 N = 64 d = 0.39 (0.11, 0.67)
Follow-up 4.29 (2.85) 5.45 (3.52) ANCOVA F(1,170) = 5.73, p=.018
N = 112 N = 61 d = 0.37 (0.06, 0.67)
MM ANOVA t(185) = −2.85, p=.005
d = 0.39 (0.12, 0.66)
Active Coping (CCSC)
Baseline 2.39 (0.58) 2.42 (0.63)
N = 134 N = 70
Post 2.55 (0.56) 2.43 (0.61) ANCOVA F(1,180) = 4.76, p=.030
N = 122 N = 64 d = 0.28 (0.03, 0.53)
Follow-up 2.57 (0.61) 2.49 (0.60) ANCOVA F(1,168) = 1.75, p=.187
N = 112 N = 61 d = 0.19 (−0.10, 0.48)
MM ANOVA t(178) = 2.20, p=.029
d = 0.24 (0.02, 0.45)