Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2015 May 14;137(20):6602–6615. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b02174

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Displacement ellipsoid plot (50% probability level) showing the cationic portion of [(TMPP)FeIII−O−CuII(tmpa)][B(C6F5)4] at 100(2) K. Counteranion, solvent molecules, and hydrogen atoms have been omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg): Cu1−N5, 2.086(8); Cu1−N6, 2.086(6); Cu1−N7, 2.046(5); Cu1−N8, 2.045(6); Cu1−O5, 1.824(7); Fe1−Np(average), 2.1022(6); Fe1−O5, 1.720(7); Cu1−O5−Fe1, 173.6(15); N5−Cu1−N6, 81.0(3); N5−Cu1−N7, 118.0(2); N5−Cu1−N8, 110.9(3); N5−Cu1−O5, 101.6(7); N6−Cu1−N7, 81.0(2); N6−Cu1−N8, 81.1(2); N6−Cu1−O5, 177.3(8); N7−Cu1−N8, 123.9(3); N7−Cu1−O5, 97.0(7); N8−Cu1−O5, 98.6(6); Np−Fe1−O5(average), 105.1(6). See Table 1 and Supporting Information for further structural details.