Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 5;152(1):155–162. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3447-7

Table 1.

Estimated relative risks for five lifestyle-related risk factor and breast cancer

Risk factor RR (95 % CI)a Mean level within risk category Comment Source
BMI (kg/m2) Continuous RR of 1.13 (95 % CI 1.08–1.18) per 5 kg/m2 World Cancer Research Fund [6]
 <25 Reference 21.9 kg/m2
 25–30 1.15 (1.09–1.21) 27.6 kg/m2
 >30 1.33 (1.19–1.49) 33.8 kg/m2
Physical inactivity Days per week of at least 30 min of moderate intensity physical activityb. Continuous RR of 1.05 (95 % CI 1.03–1.07) per 2 h activity/week. Wu et al. [7]
 Active 5 days/week Reference 170 min/dayc The reference category is based on (inter)national guidelines for physical activity [39].
 Active 3–4 days/week 1.06 (1.03–1.08) 152 min/dayc
 Active 1–2 days/week 1.07 (1.04–1.10) 147 min/dayc
 Inactive 1.34 (1.19–1.51) 73 min/dayc
Alcohol (glass/day) Continuous RR of 1.08 (95 % CI 1.05–1.10) per glass/day World Cancer Research Fund [6]
 Never drinker Reference 0 glasses/day
 <1 1.05 (1.03–1.06) 0.5 glasses/day
 1–3 1.20 (1.12–1.28) 1.9 glasses/day
 4+ 1.64 (1.35–1.97) 5.2 glasses/day
Smoking Categorical RR Gaudet et al. [5]
 Never Reference
 Past 1.09 (1.04–1.15)
 Current 1.12 (1.08–1.16)
Dietary fibre (g/1000 kJ/day) Continuous RR of 0.95 (95 % CI 0.91–0.98) per 10 g/day Aune et al. [4]
 >3.4 Reference 27 g/day The reference is based on (inter)national recommendations for dietary fibre intake [40, 41]
 2–3.4 1.03 (1.01–1.06) 21 g/day
 <2 1.07 (1.03–1.13) 14 g/day

For BMI, physical inactivity, alcohol and fibre intake, a continuous RR available from the literature was converted in an RR that matched the mean level of exposure in each risk factor category as observed from the population exposure rates. For example, based on the literature-derived RR for overweight/obesity of 1.13 per five units of increase in BMI, and a mean BMI of 21.9 kg/m2 in the reference category, 27.6 kg/m2 in the overweight category, and 33.8 kg/m2 in the obese category, the risk category associated RRs compared to the reference are 1.13(27.6−21.9)/5 = 1.15, and 1.13(33.8−21.9)/5 = 1.33 (outcome based on the calculation by using exact numbers)

aRelative risk (RR) and 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI)

bThe questionnaire included both occupational and non-occupational activities

cAverage number of minutes per week were derived from activity diaries which were filled in by a subsample of participants. Reported activity in the diaries includes all types of physical activity, irrespective of intensity level