Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Genet Epidemiol. 2015 Feb 6;39(5):385–394. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21888

Table 1.

G×G (SNP×SNP) interaction between WNT genes and CL/P GWAS genes: Most significant results of the conditional logistic regression epistatic test and corresponding case-only test results for the top ranked SNPs from Random Forests analysis and CL/P GWAS significant SNPs (SNPs pruned to have r2 < 0.1)

Gene1 Gene2 SNP1 (CHR) SNP2 (CHR) Case-only test P-value Epistatic test P-value In Asians Epistatic test P-value In Europeans
Asian
WNT5B MAFB rs4765835 (chr12) rs11696257 (chr20) P = 0.7237 (P = 0.00078)a 0.0085*
Empiric P** = 0.0076*
0.017
Empiric P** = 0.018
WNT2 IRF6 rs2023708 (chr7) rs1044516 (chr1) P = 0.023 0.019 0.65
WNT2 ABCA4 rs2023708 (chr7) rs6686599 (chr1) P = 0.012 0.015 0.29
European
WNT5A ABCA4 rs1499890 (chr3) rs3789451 (chr1) P = 0.03 0.84 0.037
WNT4 MAFB rs2807376 (chr1) rs13041247 (chr20) P = 0.017 0.44 0.044
FILIP1L chr8q24 rs813218 (chr3) rs12546523 (chr8) P = 0.017 0.19 0.0011*
Empiric P** = 0.0017*
*

P-value < 0.01

P-value < 0.05

**

Empiric P value used 10,000 permutations.

a

In Asian trios using the case-only test, rs4765835 and rs11696257 did not show evidence of interaction (P = 0.7237) but rs4765835 showed strong evidence of interaction with another SNP in MAFB, rs6102085 (P = 0.00078).