Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Nutr Biochem. 2015 May 6;26(8):876–882. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2015.03.012

Table 2.

Effect of treatments on CuCp, weight and BMI and their changes (%) from baseline in females.

CuCp (ppb) Δ CuCp % Weight (Kg) Δ Weight % BMI, kg/m2 Δ BMI %
M3 M6 M3 M6 M3 M6 M3 M6 M3 M6 M3 M6
Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD
CTRL (n=5) 1248 ± 278 1215 ± 259 1.6 ± 14.3 −1.0 ± 8.2 75.7 ± 5.6 75.3 ± 6.6 −1.0 ± 3.3 −1.6 ± 4.5 27.4 ± 2.5 27.3 ± 2.8 −1.0 ± 3.3 −1.6 ± 4.5
CR (n=6) 1255 ± 356 1232 ± 254 4.6 ± 6.9 4.5 ± 10.5 68.2 ± 8.3** 65.9 ± 8.6**# −7.3 ± 1.3 b −10.5 ± 2.0 b 25.3 ± 1.4** 24.4 ± 1.2**# −7.3 ± 1.3 b −10.5 ± 2.0 b
CR+EX (n=7) 1016 ± 294* 935 ± 306* −11.5 ± 28.1 −23.8 ± 28.0 a,x 72.4 ± 6.9** 69.1 ± 7.6**# −5.8 ± 0.6 b,y −10.3 ± 2.5 b 26.3 ± 1.8** 25.1 ± 2.1**# −5.8 ± 0.6 b,y −10.3 ± 2.5 b
LCD (n=7) 1021 ± 326 851 ± 319* −5.6 ± 20.2 −45.0 ± 41.7 b,x 66.1 ± 7.4** 65.6 ± 7.9** −14.1 ± 1.6 b,y,j −14.8 ± 1.5 b,y,j 23.7 ± 2.1** 23.5 ± 2.1** −14.1 ± 1.6 b,y,j −14.8 ± 1.5b,y,j

Absolute CuCp data are expressed in part per billion (ppb) as Mean ± SD. CTRL (n=11): healthy weight maintenance; CR (n=12): 25% caloric restriction from baseline energy requirements; CR + exercise (n=12): 12.5% caloric restriction and 12.5% energy expenditure through aerobic exercise; d) low calorie diet = achieve a 15% reduction in body mass. Statistically different from baseline:

*

p<0.05;

**

p<0.01.

Statistically different from the same parameter at M3:

#

p<0.01.

Statistically different from CTRL:

a

p<0.05;

b

p<0.01.

Statistically different from CR:

x

p<0.05;

y

p<0.01.

Statistically different from CR+EX:

j

p<0.01.