Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 17;308(12):H1530–H1539. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00008.2015

Table 1.

Baseline cardiac function in ex vivo perfused hearts isolated from NCD-fed or HFD-fed WT and mTOR-Tg mice

WT NCD-Fed Group mTOR-Tg NCD-Fed Group WT HFD-Fed Group mTOR-Tg HFD-Fed Group
Number of mice/group 24 28 24 26
LV systolic pressure, mmHg 133.6 ± 6.3 134.8 ± 4.2 163.7 ± 7.7** 160.0 ± 7.0**
LV end-diastolic pressure, mmHg 3.60 ± 0.43 4.83 ± 0.48 4.92 ± 0.43 4.94 ± 0.52
LV developed pressure, mmHg 130.0 ± 6.2 130.0 ± 4.2 158.8 ± 7.8** 154.9 ± 7.1**
LV dP/dtmax, mmHg/s 5,356 ± 314 5,476 ± 239 7,183 ± 325*** 6,836 ± 380**
LV dP/dtmin, mmHg/s −2,937 ± 141 −2,959 ± 107 −3,822 ± 107*** −3,621 ± 162**
Heart rate, beats/min 308.1 ± 8.1 299.5 ± 9.4 285.8 ± 14.7 277.5 ± 11.8
Coronary flow, ml/min 3.14 ± 0.22 3.19 ± 0.25 4.23 ± 0.18*** 3.98 ± 0.20*
Heart weight, mg 139.67 ± 5.4 134.00 ± 3.9 161.92 ± 3.86** 150.65 ± 3.36**
Heart weight/tibia length, mg/mm 6.23 ± 0.24 5.95 ± 0.16 7.23 ± 0.16** 6.78 ± 0.15***

Values are means ± SE. WT, wild-type mice; NCD, normal chow diet; mTOR-Tg, mechanistic target of rapamycin-overexpressing transgenic mice; HFD, high-fat diet.

*

P < 0.05,

**

P < 0.01, and

***

P < 0.001, NCD vs. HFD;

P < 0.05, WT vs. mTOR-Tg groups (by Student’s t-test).