. 2015 Apr 22;308(12):F1369–F1378. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00072.2015

Table 2.

Comparison of void spot assay results between strains among males and females

	Spot Number	Total Volume, μl	% Primary Void	% Center Void
Females
129S1/SvlmJ	1.3 ± 0.5^a	134.8 ± 24.4^a	92.4 ± 7.7^a	60.5 ± 14.7^a
C57BL/6J	2.7 ± 0.3^a	185.7 ± 19.5^a	67 ± 7.5^a,b	9.1 ± 10.5^b
NOD/ShiLtJ	6.1 ± 1^a	316.7 ± 32.4^b	60.4 ± 7.1^b	42.4 ± 6.9^a
CAST/EiJ	13.2 ± 7.6^b	209.5 ± 18.8^a	51.2 ± 28.1^b	44.4 ± 7.2^a
Males
129S1/SvlmJ	6.6 ± 2.3^a	264.6 ± 46.2^a	81.5 ± 5.7^a	45.3 ± 9.3^a,b
C57BL/6J	4 ± 1^a	346.7 ± 42.9^a	82.9 ± 8.4^a	23.2 ± 8.3^a
NOD/ShiLtJ	10.1 ± 2^a	404.5 ± 90.3^a	56.8 ± 6.3^a,b	55.5 ± 8.1^b
CAST/EiJ	63 ± 12^b	239.1 ± 23.2^a	30.8 ± 9.4^b	71.3 ± 7.3^b

Values are means ± SE. Data were compared for each strain among males or females. Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) between strains for males or females.