Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 17.
Published in final edited form as: Wound Repair Regen. 2013 Jun 11;21(4):624–633. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12061

Table 3.

Fibrogenic/angiogenic growth factors in wound fluids from /HeOuJ and /HeJ mice

Postwound day Strain TGF-β (ng/mL) FGF2 (pg/mL) VEGF (pg/mL)
1 /HeOuJ 1.2 ± 0.2 129 ± 10 231 ± 16
/HeJ 1.2 ± 0.2 114 ± 20 234 ± 31
7 /HeOuJ 2.9 ± 0.9b 48 ± 6 473 ± 133b
/HeJ 2.6 ± 0.3b 49 ± 7 610 ± 153b
21 /HeOuJ 5.1 ± 0.7b,c 140 ± 48 600 ± 176b,c
/HeJ 6.5 ± 1.2a,b,c 411 ± 251a,b,c 499 ± 179b,c

Wound fluids collected from /HeOuJ or /HeJ mice (six animals per strain and time point) were analyzed for TGF-β, FGF2, and VEGF by ELISA. Data are means ± SD. Results were analyzed by two-way ANOVA/Newman–Keuls. For each assay

a

indicates p < 0.05 /HeOuJ vs. /HeJ for the indicated postwound day. Within each strain and assay

b

indicates p < 0.05 vs. postwound day 1

c

indicates p < 0.05 vs. postwound day 7.

ANOVA, analysis of variance; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; FGF2, fibroblast growth factor 2; TGF-β, transforming growth factor-β; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.