Table 2.
Detailed statistical results for the analysis of nonlinguistic probe amplitude. We analyzed the effect of attention and age on the amplitude of each measured peak separately for each age group with repeated-measures ANOVAs. Factors of attention (Attended, Unattended) and scalp distribution were included in a 2 (Hemisphere: Left, Right Hemisphere) × 2 (Laterality: Lateral, Medial site) × 6 (Anteriority: Frontal, Frontocentral, Central, Central-Parietal, Parietal, Parietal-Occipital) ANOVA.
| Age | Latency | Summary | Attention | Att × hemi | Att × ant | Att × lat | Att × hemi × ant | Att × hemi × lat | Att × ant × lat | Att × ant × hemi × lat | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Component | |||||||||||
| Early positivity | 3–5 yo | (165–185) | ** |
F(1,19) = 4.5 p = .046 |
F(1,19) = 5.2 p = .035 |
F(1,19) = 12 p = .003 |
F(2.8,53) = 2.7 p = .055 |
F(1,19) = 4.3 p = .051 |
F(3.7,71) = 4.0 p = .01 |
F(3.3,63) = 3.8 p = .012 |
|
| P1 | 10 yo | (104–124) | n.s. |
F(3.1,52) = 2.3 p = .09 |
|||||||
| 13 yo | (81–101) | * |
F(1,17) = 8.1 p = .011 |
F(1,17) = 7.3 p = .015 |
|||||||
| 16 yo | (76–96) | n.s. | |||||||||
| Adults | (73–93) | *** |
F(1,19) = 21 p < .001 |
F(1,19) = 3.9 p = .062 |
F(1,19) = 27 p < .001 |
F(3.6,67) = 3.8 p = .01 |
|||||
| Early-N1 | 13 yo | (131–151) | n.s. | ||||||||
| 16 yo | (132–152) | n.s. | |||||||||
| Adults | (131–151) | n.s. | |||||||||
| P2 | 10 yo | (184–204) | * |
F(1,18) = 5.9 p = .025 |
F(1,18) = 3.6 p = .075 |
F(1,18) = 4.3 p = .053 |
F(3.5,63) = 2.3 p = .080 |
||||
| 13 yo | (190–210) | *** |
F(1,17) = 16 p = .001 |
F(1,17) = 16 p = .001 |
|||||||
| 16 yo | (193–213) | ∼ |
F(1.5,25) = 2.9 p = .090 |
F(3.0,50) = 2.4 | |||||||
| Adults | (200–220) | ** |
F(1,19) = 8.8 p = .008 |
F(1,19) = 8.2 p = .01 |
F(1,19) = 3.3 p = .084 |
||||||