. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 17.

Published in final edited form as: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Mar;6(1):25–32. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.1.25

TABLE 5.

Predicting Forecast Quality from Performance Pressure, Environmental Conflict, the Number of Positive and Negative Consequences, Critical Consequences, and Timeframe of Consequences.

	β	R²	ΔR²
Block 1		.11^**
Gender	.09^*
Motivation	.14^**
Block 2		.14	.02
Performance Pressure	−.00
Environmental Conflict	−.07
Perf Press × Env Conf	.05
Block 3		.84	.71
Number of Positive Consequences	.22^**
Number of Negative Consequences	.12
Critical Consequences	.64^**
Timeframe	.02

Note:

p < .05;

^**

p < .01.

No Performance Pressure = 0, Performance Pressure = 1; Low Environmental Conflict = 0, High Environmental Conflict = 1; Short-term Consequences = 1, Long-term Consequences = 5