Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Jul;77(5):1715–1725. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0885-6

Table 2.

Individual results from Experiment 2, including the percentage correct for each animal in each condition (Baseline, Congruent, and Incongruent) and for each level.

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
Baseline 61.63 74.37 85.70 90.53
Chewie Congruent 64.00 78.80 85.10 95.99
Incongruent 63.11 68.16 76.99* 88.11^
Baseline 58.11 70.39 77.92 85.27
Gale Congruent 75.04* 75.91 89.25* 90.72
Incongruent 59.16^ 57.84*^ 69.75^ 80.70^
Baseline 55.71 59.89 60.55 69.56
Hank Congruent 53.70 63.35 66.17 78.16
Incongruent 50.95 50.81 59.85 64.73^
Baseline 60.44 73.92 81.64 88.52
Lou Congruent 72.01 80.00 89.09 94.54
Incongruent 49.59*^ 56.30*^ 70.21*^ 82.45^*
Baseline 59.05 73.04 80.86 87.43
Luke Congruent 63.47 69.46 83.18 91.13
Incongruent 58.57 80.77 81.66 90.43
Baseline 55.62 64.54 74.42 80.12
Murph Congruent 56.76 66.32 81.48 79.86
Incongruent 42.42*^ 55.62 68.34 70.75*
Baseline 64.23 80.00 93.13 93.67
Obi Congruent 70.99 84.61 89.92 96.32
Incongruent 55.82^ 78.02 83.92* 88.91

Note.

The asterisk indicates p < .05 for the comparison of Congruent to Baseline condition or the Incongruent to Baseline condition.

The caret indicates p < .05 for the comparison of Congruent to Incongruent conditions.