Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 17;10(6):e0129790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129790

Table 2. Factors associated with physical and emotional forms of spousal violence, PDHS 2012–2013 (n = 3545).

Characteristics Model 0 Model 1 Model 2
OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value
Any form of spousal violence
Intergenerational transfer of spousal violence (mother also experienced spousal violence)
 No 1 1 1
 Yes 4.31 (3.40–5.45) < 0.01 4.06 (3.16–5.22) < 0.01 3.88 (3.00–5.02) < 0.01
 Do not know 1.21 (0.84–1.75) 0.29 1.11 (0.74–1.63) 0.61 1.07 (0.71–1.62) 0.73
Attitudinal acceptance of spousal violence (beating justified if wife argues with husband)
 No 1 1 1
 Yes 2.14 (1.77–2.58) < 0.01 1.81 (1.48–2.21) < 0.01 1.54 (1.24–1.90) < 0.01
 Do not know 2.66 (0.99–7.13) 0.05 2.50 (0.92–6.74) 0.06 2.77 (0.91–8.40) 0.07
Physical violence
Intergenerational transfer of spousal violence (mother experienced spousal violence)
 No 1 1 1
 Yes 6.25 (4.97–7.86) < 0.01 5.97 (4.67–7.62) < 0.01 5.71 (4.40–7.41) < 0.01
 Do not know 1.70 (1.14–2.52) < 0.01 1.55 (1.01–2.36) 0.04 1.55 (1.00–2.40) 0.04
Attitudinal acceptance of spousal violence (beating justified if wife argues with husband)
 No 1 1 1
 Yes 2.38 (1.90–2.99) < 0.01 1.99 (1.56–2.54) < 0.01 1.66 (1.27–2.15) < 0.01
 Do not know 0.65 (0.26–1.60) 0.35 0.60 (0.24–1.46) 0.26 0.53 (0.22–1.26) 0.15
Emotional violence
Intergenerational transfer of spousal violence (mother experienced spousal violence)
 No 1 1 1
 Yes 3.22 (2.53–4.09) < 0.01 3.01 (2.34–3.86) < 0.01 2.86 (2.22–3.68) < 0.01
 Do not know 1.02 (0.67–1.53) 0.93 0.92 (0.59–1.43) 0.73 0.89 (0.55–1.41) 0.63
Attitudinal acceptance of spousal violence (beating justified if wife argues with husband)
 No 1 1 1
 Yes 1.92 (1.60–2.30) < 0.01 1.63 (1.34–1.98) < 0.01 1.43 (1.16–1.75) < 0.01
 Do not know 3.64 (1.52–8.74) < 0.01 3.38 (1.41–8.08) < 0.01 3.40 (1.17–9.85) 0.02

Model 0 = Univariate analysis

Model 1 = Model 0 + Age at marriage, respondent's education level, wealth index

Model 2 = Model 1 + parity, respondent's employment status, respondent's empowerment status