Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 12;4(1):1–19. doi: 10.1007/s40123-014-0027-6

Table 4.

Use of adjunctive therapy

Eyes, n 1-year pre-implantation, n (%) 1-year post-implantation, n (%) 3 years post-implantation, n (%) P valuec
Systemic medicationsa
 0.59 mg 117 74 (63.2) 16 (13.9) 14 (12.0) <0.0001
 2.1 mg 122 72 (59.0) 11 (9.2) 16 (13.1) <0.0001
 All 239 146 (61.1) 27 (11.5) 30 (12.6) <0.0001
Periocular injections, study eyeb
 0.59 mg 117 65 (55.6) 8 (6.8) 11 (9.4) <0.0001
 2.1 mg 122 76 (62.3) 8 (6.6) 30 (24.6) <0.0001
 All 239 141 (59.0) 16 (6.7) 41 (17.2) <0.0001
Periocular injections, fellow eyeb
 0.59 mg 117 26 (22.2) 46 (39.3) 56 (47.9) <0.0001
 2.1 mg 121 31 (25.6) 42 (34.7) 55 (45.5) 0.0001
 All 238 57 (23.9) 88 (37.0) 111 (46.6) <0.0001
Topical corticosteroids, study eyea
 0.59 mg 117 47 (40.2) 11 (9.6) 9 (7.7) <0.0001
 2.1 mg 122 50 (41.0) 6 (5.0) 25 (20.5) 0.0079
 All 239 97 (40.6) 17 (7.2) 34 (14.2) <0.0001
Topical corticosteroids, fellow eyea
 0.59 mg 117 28 (23.9) 37 (32.2) 25 (21.4) 0.7055
 2.1 mg 121 32 (26.4) 36 (30.3) 35 (28.9) 0.3035
 All 238 60 (25.2) 73 (31.2) 60 (25.2) 0.6115

aComparisons were made at the baseline visit and at the 1- and 3-year visits

bComparisons were made during the entire 1-year pre-implantation period and the 1- and 3-year post-implantation periods. One fellow eye (2.1-mg FA implant group) was prosthetic, and thus the sample size for fellow eyes was 238)

c P value for 1 year pre-implantation data compared with 3 year postimplantation data