Table 2. Relative abundance of common nasopharyngeal bacterial 16S rRNA sequence types.
Taxa | All Subjects | PHiD-CV Group (N = 25) a | Control Group (N = 29) a | Day 180-Day0 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 0 | Day 0 | Day 180 | Day 0 | Day 180 | Comparison (p-value) b | |
Proteobacteria | 56.9% (33.7–70.6) | 58.6% (31.4–70.2) | 61.7% (46.2–78.3) | 53.8% (36.1–70.6) | 57.1% (43.6–69.8) | 0.74 |
Haemophilus influenzae | 1.6% (0–9.8) | 1.6% (0–7.9) | 1.0% (0–4.9) | 2.0% (0–13.8) | 2.5% (0–12.6) | 0.85 |
Moraxella catarrhalis | 12.3% (3.7–24.5) | 15.7% (3.4–28) | 12% (1–24.6) | 9.2% (3.7–18.8) | 4.2% (1.4–13.1) | 0.65 |
Moraxella nonliquefaciens | 2.1% (0.6–10) | 2.5% (1.2–9.5) | 4.0% (0.8–14) | 1.4% (0.3–10.2) | 2.4% (0.1–8.9) | 0.47 |
Firmicutes | 25.9% (15–46.8) | 20.1% (11.8–44.8) | 18.2% (8.6–46.6) | 26.6% (19.9–46.9) | 31.6% (15.6–41.2) | 0.66 |
Streptococcus pneumoniae | 4.4% (0.2–25.4) | 4.0% (0.3–32.3) | 10.3% (0.4–37.7) | 4.9% (0–21.1) | 10% (0.9–35.3) | 0.67 |
Actinobacteria | 7.8% (1.8–21.6) | 8.5% (1.5–15.8) | 5.1% (0.9–9.2) | 6.9% (2.3–22.1) | 2.1% (0.5–15.2) | 0.18 |
Corynebacterium spp. | 5.6% (1.7–19.8) | 8.5% (0.9–15.4) | 3.8% (0.8–7.7) | 5.2% (2–21.1) | 2.1% (0.4–15.1) | 0.45 |
Bacteroidetes | 0.4% (0.1–3.8) | 0.7% (0.2–4.1) | 1.0% (0–4.2) | 0.3% (0.1–2.4) | 0.3% (0–3.3) | 0.92 |
Other Phyla | 0% (0–0.2) | 0% (0–0.3) | 0.1% (0–0.2) | 0.1% (0–0.2) | 0% (0–0.2) | 0.15 |
Sequences per specimen | 3730 | 2104 | 2605 | 4939 | 2678 | 0.35 |
(Interquartile range) | (1649–9799) | (1146–9587) | (1610–7393) | (2231–10112) | (856–7046) | |
Good’s Coverage | 99.58% | 99.60% | 99.70% | 99.60% | 99.80% | 0.96 |
Shannon Diversity | 2.91 | 2.71 | 2.75 | 2.92 | 2.46 c | 0.29 |
a Median relative abundances of sequences classified for most abundant phyla and selected species.
b PHiD-CV group vs control group; p-values for comparison of the change in relative abundances over time are from the results of the multiple permutation t-test; p-values for “Sequences per Specimen”, “Good’s Coverage”, and “Shannon Diversity” are from 2-tailed t-test.
c P = 0.02 for Day 180 vs Day 0 comparison of control group. P = 0.85 for PHiD-CV comparison of Day 180 vs Day0.