Table 5. Comparison of EWI Performance between the Primary versus Secondary/Tertiary Levels.
| EWI | Target performance | Secondary/Tertiary Levels (08) | Primary Level (07) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWI 1 | Desirable (>90%) | 60% (3/5) | 14.3% (1/7) | 0.001 |
| Fair (80–90%) | 20% (1/5) | 28.6% (2/7) | 0.7 | |
| ❖ Poor (<80%) | 20% (1/5) | 57.1% (4/7) | 0.00002 | |
| EWI 2 | Desirable (>85%) | 71.4% (5/7) | 66.7% (4/6) | 0,8 |
| Fair (75–85%) | 14.3% (1/7) | 0% (0/6) | < 0.0001 | |
| ❖ Poor (<75%) | 14.3% (1/7) | 33.3% (2/6) | 0.005 | |
| EWI 3 | Desirable (100%) | 0% (0/7) | 28.6% (2/7) | 0.03 |
| ❖ Poor (<100%) | 100% (7/7) | 71.4% (5/7) | 0.0289 | |
| EWI 4 | Desirable (0%) | 100% (8/8) | 100% (7/7) | 0.99 |
| ❖ Poor (>0%) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) | 1 | |
| EWI 5 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
EWI, early warning indicator; NA, Not available; ‘‘Primary” referred to first-level health facilities; ‘‘Secondary” referred to medium/intermediate level health facilities; ‘‘Tertiary” referred to high/reference level health facilities;
❖Poor performance interpreted as “Potential HIVDR”.