Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 29;45(7):1967–1977. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2353-x

Table 2.

IDT scores for the ASD High ADOS group, the ASD Low ADOS group, the total ASD group and the typically developing comparison group

IDT measures High ADOS group (n = 51) Low ADOS group (n = 80) Total ASD group (n = 131) Comparison group (n = 62) Group differences Effect sizes (ηp 2)
Total ASD versus comparison High ADOS versus comparison Low ADOS versus comparison
M (SD) Range M (SD) Range M (SD) Range M (SD) Range
Number of turns 13.5 (3.2) 5–29 14.1 (4.7) 7–21 13.9 (4.2) 5–29 16.2 (4.8) 5–25 (High & Low) < C** .08 .13 .07
Reciprocal turn taking .81 (.67) 0–2 1.04 (.67). 0–2 .95 (.68) 0–2 1.48 (.54) 0–2 (High & Low) < C** .13 .25 .10
Reciprocal drawing .61 (.26) 0–1 .63 (.24) 0–1 .62 (.24) 0–1 .71 (.15) .27–1 (High & Low) < C* .03 .05 .03
Reciprocity in other’s initiative .19 (.16) 0–.54 .17 (.14) 0–.73 .18 (.14) 0–.73 .41 (.17) 0–.82 (High & Low) < C** .36 .33 .40
Reciprocal flexibility 1.7 (1.1) 0–3 1.9 (.91) 0–3 1.8 (.97) 0–3 2.5 (.60) 1–3 (High & Low) < C** .13 .21 .12

p < .05; ** p < .001