Table 4:
Bibliographic information | Intervention (I) and comparator (C) | Sources of model parameters |
Type of model and timeframe |
Intervention cost | Perspective/price year | Economic results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study population | Economic analysis | |||||
Model timeframe | ||||||
(National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2009a). England | I: Comprehensive mental health promotion programme | Systematic review of literature for effectiveness data | Decision analytical modelling study | Cost of intervention not estimated, just costs averted | Company | Positive steps to improve the management of mental health in the workplace, including prevention and early identification of problems, could result in annual cost savings to company of 30%. In an organization with 1000 employees, this is equivalent to cost savings of £250 607 a year |
C: No intervention | Hypothetical company with 1000 employees | 12 months | 2009 GBPs | |||
COA |
RCT, randomized controlled trial; CBA, cost–benefit analysis; CEA, cost-effectiveness analysis; CCA, cost-consequences analysis; CUA, cost–utility analysis; COA, cost-offset analysis.