Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec;26(Suppl 1):i108–i139. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dar059

Table 4:

Economic modelling studies for interventions promoting mental health and well-being at work

Bibliographic information Intervention (I) and comparator (C) Sources of model parameters
Type of model and timeframe
Intervention cost Perspective/price year Economic results
Study population Economic analysis
Model timeframe
(National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2009a). England I: Comprehensive mental health promotion programme Systematic review of literature for effectiveness data Decision analytical modelling study Cost of intervention not estimated, just costs averted Company Positive steps to improve the management of mental health in the workplace, including prevention and early identification of problems, could result in annual cost savings to company of 30%. In an organization with 1000 employees, this is equivalent to cost savings of £250 607 a year
C: No intervention Hypothetical company with 1000 employees 12 months 2009 GBPs
COA

RCT, randomized controlled trial; CBA, cost–benefit analysis; CEA, cost-effectiveness analysis; CCA, cost-consequences analysis; CUA, cost–utility analysis; COA, cost-offset analysis.