Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 4;14(2):189–197. doi: 10.1002/wps.20216

Table 5.

Prediction of presence of any axis I disorder by APS requirements and estimation of interaction with age effects

Prediction by APS requirements* β SE Wald (df=1) p Exp (β) 95% CI Omnibus test Interaction with age effects** β SE Wald (df=1) p Exp (β) 95% CI Omnibus test
Occurrence of APS irrespective of onset/worsening and frequency requirements
Any APS 1.62 0.28 33.16 <0.001 5.03 2.90-8.73 Inline graphic, p<0.001 Any APS × age No interaction effect
Any perceptive APS 1.48 0.37 15.77 <0.001 4.39 2.12-9.10 Inline graphic, p<0.001 Only perceptive APS × age No stable model
Any non-perceptive APS 1.50 0.34 19.52 <0.001 4.49 2.31-8.74 Inline graphic, p=0.044 Only non-perceptive APS × age No interaction effect
Occurrence of APS considering the onset/worsening but not the frequency requirement
Any APS 1.80 0.41 19.29 <0.001 6.07 2.72-13.58 Inline graphic, p<0.001 Any APS × age 0.10 0.02 18.97 <0.001 1.11 1.06-1.16 Inline graphic, p<0.001
Any perceptive APS 1.06 0.61 3.02 0.082 2.89 0.87-9.59 Inline graphic, p=0.108 Only perceptive APS × age No interaction effect
Any non-perceptive APS 1.86 1.01 3.43 0.064 6.45 0.90-46.32 Inline graphic, p=0.081 Only non-perceptive APS × age No interaction effect
Occurrence of APS considering the frequency but not the onset/worsening requirement
Any APS 2.08 0.37 31.75 <0.001 7.99 3.88-16.46 Inline graphic, p<0.001 Any APS × age No interaction effect
Any perceptive APS 1.55 0.60 6.77 0.009 4.72 1.47-15.19 Inline graphic, p=0.016 Only perceptive APS × age No interaction effect
Any non-perceptive APS 2.14 0.43 25.24 <0.001 8.52 3.69-19.66 Inline graphic, p<0.001 Only non-perceptive APS × age No interaction effect
*

Binary logistic regression analyses with method “enter”, ** binary logistic regression analyses with method “backward” and “forward” using the respective requirement and its interaction with age as independent variables. Significant predictors are in bold type

APS – attenuated psychotic symptoms