Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 31.
Published in final edited form as: BJU Int. 2014 Jul 14;115(2):230–237. doi: 10.1111/bju.12638

Table 2.

Association between hospital type and individual quality measures

Treatment within 3 months Neoadjuvant chemotherapy ≥10 Lymph nodes Continent diversion
Hospital Type OR [CI] P Value OR [CI] P Value OR [CI] P Value OR [CI] P Value
Community 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Comprehensive low volume 1.07 [0.9–1.2] 0.47 1.00 [0.8–1.2] 0.99 1.00 [0.9–1.1] 0.99 1.03 [0.8–1.3] 0.82
Comprehensive high volume 1.17 [0.9–1.5] 0.23 1.15 [0.7–1.8] 0.54 1.36 [1.04–1.8] 0.03 1.19 [0.7–1.9] 0.49
Academic low volume 0.86 [0.7–1.01] 0.07 0.96 [0.8–1.2] 0.71 1.53 [1.3–1.8] <0.001 1.10 [0.8–1.5] 0.53
Academic high volume 0.72 [0.6–0.9] 0.001 1.60 [1.3–2.0] <0.0001 3.14 [2.5–4.0] <0.001 2.40 [1.8–3.3] <0.0001

Adjusting for year, age, gender, race, Hispanic ethnicity, payor group, Charlson-Deyo score, income, education, tumor grade, analytic stage, urban/rural status, and facility location