. 2015 Apr 22;40(1):35–41. doi: 10.5114/ceji.2015.50831

Table 2.

Effects of rhamnetin on the path length to locate the escape platform

	Day 15 (cm)	Day 16 (cm)	Day 17 (cm)	Day 18 (cm)	Day 19 (cm)
Control	1630 ±136	1390 ±140	1106 ±96	826 ±79	570 ±66
Sham	1707 ±146	1406 ±149	1195 ±101	900 ±114	631 ±71
TBI	2884 ±297^a,^b	2605 ±302^a,^b	2401 ±260^a,^b	2139 ±249^a,^b	1956 ±335^a,^b
TBI + L	2655 ±200^a,^b	2349 ±186^a,^b	2235 ±201^a,^b	1761 ±267^a,^b	1503 ±250^a,^b
TBI + M	2305 ±198^a,^b,^c	2018 ±198^a,^b,^c	1890 ±153^a,^b,^c	1618 ±182^a,^b,^c	999 ±116^a,^b,^c
TBI + H	2235 ±207^a,^b,^c	1965 ±171^a,^b,^c	1629 ±184^a,^b,^c	1406 ±135^a,^b,^c	963 ±91^a,^b,^c

Control – control group; Sham – sham group; TBI – TBI group; TBI + L – rhamnetin low-dose group; TBI + M – rhamnetin middle-dose group; TBI + H – rhamnetin high-dose group. Spatial learning consisted of four repeated trials per day with an intertribal of 4 minutes. The swim distances of the four trials of each animal were averaged. Data were expressed as mean ± SD (N = 10 per group) and were analysed using one-way ANOVA with subsequent SNK test.

p < 0.05, vs. the control group

p < 0.05, vs. the sham group

p < 0.05, vs. the TBI group