Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 18;9(6):e0003850. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003850

Table 2. Study design and mortality of mice challenged via the IN route with 2x105 PFU of MPXV.

Group Cage No. of Mice Vaccine (T = 0) a Booster (T = 23) b MPXV Challenge (T = 50) c Day of Death (RTC) d MTD±SEM d Mortality (%)
1 1 5 N/T N/T PBS
2 2 5 N/T N/T + 7,8,8,9,9 8.2±0.4 100
3 3 5 Veh Veh + 7,9,9,9,17 10.2±1.7 100
4 4 5 MVA Veh
5 5 MVA MVA +
5 6 5 A29L Veh 8,9,9,9 8.8±0.3 80
7 41 A29L A29L + 7,10,10, 9.0±1.0 75
6 8 5 M1R Veh 7,8 7.5±0.5 40
9 5 M1R M1R +
7 10 5 B6R Veh 6,8,9 7.7±0.9 60
11 4 e B6R B6R + 7,8 7.5±0.5 50
8 12 5 Combo Veh 7,8 7.5±0.5 40
13 5 Combo Combo + 9 9.0 20

aBoHV-4 vaccines were administered at T = 0 days via the IP route in a total volume of 0.3 ml at 1x107 PFU. MVA was administered at a dose of 2x107 PFU in a total volume of 0.1 ml injected IM. Veh indicates a DMEM vehicle.

bBooster vaccinations were administered as for a.

cMice were challenged via the IN route with 2x105 PFU of MPXV. Virus was introduced in a total volume of 25 #x03BC;l to one nare.

dRTC, relative to challenge; MTD, mean time to death; SEM, standard error of the mean.

eOne mouse was removed due to mortality during blood collection.