Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 15;2(2):ofv048. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofv048

Table 3.

Distribution of Outbreak Size for Measles in Canada Between 2002 and 2013 and Estimates of the Reproduction Number (R) According to the Proportion of Imported Cases and Outbreak Size

Outbreak Size
Number of Cases
% of Imported Cases
Effective R
1 Case Total (NL)a 2 Cases Total (NL)a ≥3 Cases Total (NL)a All Total (NL)a Total (NL)a Crude % (n/N) Correcteda % (n/N) From Correctedb % Imported From Correctedb Outbreak Size
2002 7 (3) 7 (3) 7 (3) 57% (4/7) 70% (7/10) 0.30 (0.07–0.78) 0 (0–0.19)
2003 8 (1) 2 (1) 10 (2) 16 (5) 50% (8/16) 56% (10/18) 0.44 (0.20–0.83) 0.11 (0.02–0.34)
2004 5 (1) 1 6 (1) 8 (1) 63% (5/8) 67% (6/9) 0.33 (0.08–0.86) 0.22 (0.04–0.69)
2005 4 (2) 1 5 (2) 6 (2) 50% (3/6) 63% (5/8) 0.37 (0.09–0.97) 0.12 (0.01–0.55)
2006 3 3 (1) 1 (1) 7 (2) 13 (6) 38% (5/13) 47% (7/15) 0.53 (0.24–0.99) 0.40 (0.16–0.81)
2007 3 (1) 2 (1) 5 (2) 102 (97) 3% (3/102) 5% (5/104) 0.95 (0.78–1.0) 0.93 (0.76–1.13)
2008 5 (1) 2 1 (1) 8 (2) 62 (54) 10% (6/62) 13% (8/64) 0.87 (0.67–1.0) 0.84 (0.64–1.09)
2009 2 2 4 14 29% (4/14) 29% (4/14) 0.71 (0.36–1.0) 0.71 (0.36–1.25)
2010 11 (3) 1 (1) 3 (2) 15 (6) 99 (85) 9% (9/99) 14% (15/105) 0.86 (0.69–1.0) 0.80 (0.64–0.98)
2011 25 (1) 4 (3) 5 (2) 34 (6) 752 (20) 4% (28/752) 4% (34/758) 0.96 (0.89–1.0) 0.95 (0.88–1.02)
2012 7 (1) 1 8 (1) 9 (1) 78% (7/9) 80% (8/10) 0.20 (0.03–0.62) 0.10 (0.01–0.44)
2013 12 (5) 2 7 (5) 21 (10) 83 (26) 13% (11/83) 23% (21/93) 0.77 (0.61–0.97) 0.67 (0.51–0.85)
Total 92 (19) 14 (5) 24 (13) 130 (37) 1171 (300) 8% (93/1171) 11% (130/1208) 0.89 (0.84–0.95) 0.86 (0.81–0.92)

a Total (NL): Total number of outbreaks (outbreaks not linked to an imported case).

b Corrected for outbreaks not linked with an imported case. We assumed that for each of these outbreaks, only the imported case was missed, and we added these missed cases to both the numerator and denominator.