Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 18;53(7):2172–2179. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00249-15

TABLE 2.

Differences between MSM and heterosexuals in C. trachomatis genotypes and population structures

Parameter MSM populationa Heterosexual population
Most predominant ompA genovars D (26%, n = 160) D (12%, n = 170); P < 0.001 for the five serotypes
E (5%, n = 29) E (45%, n = 617)
G (29%, n = 179) G (10%, n = 134)
F (4%, n = 22) F (16%, n = 215)
J (14%, n = 85) J (4%, n = 53)
No. clustersb A few large clusters Multiple clusters of various size
Overlap with clusters in the other risk groupc Almost absent A small proportion
Subpopulations within clusters No Ethnicityd
Geographic variation within clusters No Yese
a

ompA data missing for 4 MSM.

b

See Fig. 1B.

c

Clusters in MST analysis with specimens from MSM (red in Fig. 1B) have almost no specimens from the suggested heterosexuals, while in clusters predominated by heterosexuals (blue), a smaller proportion of specimens come from MSM.

d

Exemplified by studies described in references 18 and 20.

e

See Fig. 1C.