Table 2.

Single sample estimates of population correlation relations.

Pair of variables	Pearson correlation	Percentage bend correlation	Skipped correlation using DGM
Orienting–total tectal volume	−0.24	−0.30	−0.30
Orienting–total superior parietal cortex volume	0.19	0.20	0.17
Orienting–frontal fractional anisotropy	0.05	0.02	−0.07
Orienting–parietal fractional anisotropy	−0.03	0.01	0.04
Orienting–frontal axial diffusivity	0.17	0.15	0.14
Orienting–parietal axial diffusivity	0.03	0.05	0.10
Orienting–frontal radial diffusivity	0.03	0.09	0.10
Orienting–parietal radial diffusivity	0.04	0.04	0.04
Conflict resolution–total tectal volume	0.01	0.05	0.05
Conflict resolution–total superior parietal cortex volume	−0.23	−0.19	−0.20
Conflict resolution–frontal fractional anisotropy	−0.02	−0.04	0.01
Conflict resolution–parietal fractional anisotropy	−0.08	−0.12	0.01
Conflict resolution–frontal axial diffusivity	0.05	0.05	0.07
Conflict resolution–parietal axial diffusivity	−0.04	−0.09	0.01
Conflict resolution–frontal radial diffusivity	0.02	0.08	0.06
Conflict resolution–parietal radial diffusivity	0.03	0.05	0.03
Attentional control–total tectal volume	−0.02	0.00	0.09
Attentional control–total superior parietal cortex volume	0.11	0.10	0.10
Attentional control–frontal fractional anisotropy	0.03	0.09	0.01
Attentional control–parietal fractional anisotropy	−0.19	−0.14	−0.20
Attentional control–frontal axial diffusivity	0.32	0.17	0.10
Attentional control–parietal axial diffusivity	0.32	0.04	0.06
Attentional control–frontal radial diffusivity	0.16	0.10	0.16
Attentional control–parietal radial diffusivity	0.37	0.20	0.21

N = 74 (relations with orienting and conflict resolution measures); N = 59 (relations with attentional control); N = 73 (relations with the superior parietal cortex); DGM, Donoho–Gasko median; boldface = statistically significant results based on p < 0.05.