Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct;96(7):521–525. doi: 10.1308/003588414X13946184903847

Table 3.

Summary of the scores in 40 patients, assessed preoperatively and at 2 follow-up visits

Median ICIQ-MLUTS LF score (IQR) Median ICIQ-UI SF score (IQR)
AUS AVMS p-value* AUS AVMS p-value*
T0 (n=40) 30 (13–36) 23 (18–23) 0.6 15 (8–19) 16 (14–18) 0.4
FU1 (n=40) 12 (8–17) 21 (13–25) 0.03 2 (0–4) 4 (0–10) 0.08
FU2 (n=25) 20.5 (14–22) 18 (12–20) 0.4 6 (1–11) 7 (4–11) 0.9

ICIQ-MLUTS LF = International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire on Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Long Form;

ICIQ-UI SF = International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire on Urinary Incontinence Short Form; AUS = artificial urinary sphincter; AVMS = AdVance™ male sling; IQR = interquartile range; T0 = preoperative; FU = follow-up

*

Wilcoxon signed-rank test comparing scores between procedures