Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov;96(8):602–605. doi: 10.1308/003588414X14055925058436

Table 2.

Clinical characteristics and development of postoperative submandibular gland symptoms

Submandibular gland symptoms p-value*
All 15/52 (29%)
Sex Male 9/31 (29%) >0.99
Female 6/21 (29%)
Age at operation 39–54 years 5/16 (31%) 0.02
55–64 years 9/19 (47%)
65–93 years 1/17 (6%)
Year of operation 2007–2009 8/25 (32%) 0.76
2010–2011 7/27 (26%)
Pathological TNM staging T0/T1 N0 14/47 (30%) >0.99
(T0/T1 N0 vs other)
T2 N0 1/4 (25%)
T2 N1 0/1 (0%)
Site lesion Anterior unilateral FOM 8/24 (33%) No test done
Bilateral/midline FOM 4/11 (36%)
FOM unspecified 0/1 (0%)
Unilateral ventral tongue 1/11 (9%)
Bilateral ventral tongue 0/1 (0%)
Anterior unilateral FOM and unilateral ventral tongue 1/3 (33%)
Bilateral/midline FOM and unilateral ventral tongue 1/1 (100%)
Treatment modality Laser excision 10/38 (26%) 0.48
(laser vs monopolar)
Monopolar cautery 5/12 (42%)
Laser and adjuvant radiotherapy 0/1 (0%)
Monopolar and adjuvant radiotherapy 0/1 (0%)
Submandibular duct Not identified 9/32 (28%) 0.02**
Identified but not repositioned 4/5 (80%)
Identified and repositioned 2/15 (13%)

TNM = tumour, lymph nodes, metastasis; FOM = floor of the mouth

*

Fisher’s exact test (2 comparison groups) and chi-squared test (3 or more groups)

**

p=0.18 for repositioned during surgery vs not repositioned (2/15 [13%] vs 13/37 [35%])