Table 1.
Cohort studies investigating association between antihistamines and birth defects included in systematic review (n=31)
Author, Year | Setting | Antihistamines studied | Comparison group |
Exposure ascertainment |
Birth defects outcomes |
Total # pregnancies; # exposed; # unexposed |
# Birth defects among exposed and unexposed |
Measures of association |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aselton et al. 198525* | United States (Washington, Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound), 1980-1982 | Diphenhydramine, triprolidine + pseudoephedrine, chlorpheniramine, brompheniramine, promethazine; use during first trimester | Baseline risk in total cohort | Pharmacy claims data from Group Health Cooperative | Any major birth defect ascertained through hospital discharge data with medical record reviews for suspected cases; clinical geneticist review of selected records | Total pregnancies: 6,509; diphenhydramine: 270; triprolidine + pseudoephedrine: 244; chlorpheniramine: 175; brompheniramine + phenylephrine + phenylpropanolamine: 172; promethazine: 63; phenylpropanolamine + chlorpheniramine: 82 | Diphenhydramine: 4/270 (1.5%); triprolidine + pseudoephedrine: 3/244 (1.3%); chlorpheniramine: 2/175 (1.1%); brompheniramine + phenylephrine + phenylpropanolamine: 5/172 (2.9%); promethazine: 0/63 (0%); phenylpropanolamine + chlorpheniramine: 2/82 (2.4%); baseline risk of birth defects: 16 per 1,000 (1.6%) | Not calculated |
Ashkenazi-Hoffnung et al. 201320 | Israel Teratogen Information Service, 2008-2010 | Doxylamine + pyridoxine; use typically began during first trimester | Women taking metoclopramide | Self-reported through structured questionnaire; women (or their healthcare providers) called TIS because of question about exposure | Any major birth defect ascertained through follow-up interview with mothers up to two years after initial inquiry | Total pregnancies: 58 (59 infants); doxylamine + pyridoxine: 29; metoclopramide: 29 | Doxylamine + pyridoxine: 0/29; metoclopramide: 1/29 (3.4%) | Not calculated |
Asker et al. 200513 | Sweden, 1995-2002 | Meclizine; cyclizine; promethazine; diphenhydramine; use during first, second, and/or third trimester | Baseline risk in total cohort | Interview at first prenatal care visit (~10-12 weeks gestation) captured first trimester exposures; drugs prescribed during prenatal care were documented prospectively in medical record; analysis focused on first trimester use | Any major birth defect ascertained through record linkage with other national databases | Total pregnant women: 665,572 (676,198 infants); first trimester exposure: meclizine: 18,008; cyclizine: 1,221; promethazine:1,961; diphenhydramine: 147; | Any antiemetic: 3.1%; meclizine: 3.1%; cyclizine: 3.6%; promethazine: 3.2% diphenhydramine: 1.1% Baseline risk of birth defects: 3.5%; | Adjusted OR (95% CI) for exposure anytime during pregnancy and any birth defect: meclizine: 0.89 (0.82-0.96); cyclizine: 1.08 (0.86-1.35); promethazine: 0.91 (0.75-1.11); diphenhydramine: not calculated |
Boskovic et al. 200421 | Canada Teratogen Information Service (Motherisk), 2001-2003 | Doxylamine + pyridoxine: standard dose and “supradose”; use typically began late in the first trimester (mean: 9 ± 2 weeks gestation) Note: Primary exposure of interest was lack of morning sickness |
Pregnancies without NVP | Self-reported through structured questionnaire; women (or their healthcare providers) called TIS because of question about first trimester exposure | Any major birth defect ascertained through postnatal follow-up interview with mother; maternal reporting of birth defects verified by written report requested from pediatrician | NVP + standard dose of doxylamine + pyridoxine: 122; NVP + “supradose” of doxylamine + pyridoxine: 124 No NVP: 130 | NVP + standard dose of doxylamine + pyridoxine: 2/122 (1.6%); NVP + “supradose” of doxylamine + pyridoxine: 0/124; No NVP in pregnancy: 0/130 | Not calculated |
Bsat et al. 200328 | United States (Clinical outpatient setting), 1994-1996 | Promethazine; use typically began late in the first trimester (mean: 8.6 ± 2 weeks gestation) | Women taking B6-metoclopramide or prochlorperazine | Administered through randomized clinical trial | Any major birth defect; method of ascertainment not stated | Singleton pregnanices: 156; promethazine: 52 B6-metoclopramide: 54 prochlorperazine: 50 | Promethazine: 0/52 B6-metoclopramide: 0/54;prochlorperazine: 1/50 | Not calculated |
Colin Jones et al. 198559 | Scotland, 1978-1979 | Cimetidine; use anytime during pregnancy | Unexposed to cimetidine | Prescriptions reported by general practitioners | Any “abnormal children” reported by general practitioners | Total pregnancies:42; cimetidine: 20; unexposed: 22 | Cimetidine: 1/20 (5%); unexposed: 0/22 | Not calculated |
Diav-Citrin et al. 200329 | Israel, Teratogen Information Service, 1995-2001 (loratadine exposure); 1990-2001 (comparison populations) | Loratadine; other antihistamines (astemizole, chlorpheniramine, terfenadine, hydroxyzine, promethazine);use during first trimester and anytime during pregnancy | Exposed to NTS | Self-reported through structured questionnaire; women (or their healthcare providers) called TIS because of question about exposure | Any major birth defect ascertained through postnatal follow-up interview with mother, typically within one year after delivery | Total pregnancies:1,406; loratadine: 210; OAH: 267; NTS: 929 [Note: these numbers differ from the number of exposed with pregnancy outcome information due to loss to follow-up] |
Anytime during pregnancy: Loratadineloratadine: 4/175 (2.3%), OAH: 10/247 (4.0%), NTS: 25/844 (3.0%); During first trimester: loratadine: 1/126 (0.8%), OAH: 7/146 (4.8%), NTS:25/844 (3.0%) |
Unadjusted RR (95% CI) for exposure anytime during pregnancy: loratadine vs. OAH: 0.56 (0.18-1.77); loratadine vs. NTS: 0.77 (0.27-2.19); for first trimester exposure: loratadine vs. OAH: 0.17 (0.02-1.33); loratadine vs. NTS: 0.27 (0.04-1.94) |
Einarson et al. 199722 | Canada Teratogen Information Service (Motherisk), 1989-1994; | Hydroxyzine, cetirizine; use during first trimester and entire pregnancy | Unexposed to antihistamines; unexposed matched to exposed on several potential confounders | Self-reported through structured questionnaire; women (or their healthcare providers) called TIS because of question about exposure | Any major birth defect ascertained through maternal self-report during postnatal follow-up telephone interview; outcomes of interest confirmed whenever possible by the child's pediatrician. | Hydroxyzine: 81 (43 with first trimester exposure and live births); cetirizine: 39 (33 with first trimester exposure and live births); unexposed: 120 | Hydroxyzine: 2/43 (4.6%); cetirizine: 0/33; unexposed: 0/120 | Not calculated |
Erez et al. 197123 | Turkey, 1967-1969 | Hydroxyzine; administered twice daily for 3 weeks during first two months of pregnancy | Placebo | Administered through double-blind placebo controlled trial | Any major birth defect ascertained by study pediatrician and obstetrician examining each delivered infant within 40 hours after birth (115 out of 150 were followed up until delivery) | Total pregnancies: 150; hydroxyzine: 100; placebo: 50 | Hydroxyzine: 1/100 (1%); placebo: 0/50 | Not calculated |
Garbis et al. 200560 | European Network of Teratology Information Services (ENTIS), 1990-1997 for exposed cohort; 1990-1999 for unexposed cohort | H2-receptor antagonists: ranitidine (n=335), cimetidine (n=113); famotidine (n=75); nizatidine (n=15); roxatidine (n=15); use anytime during pregnancy though most were exposed during first trimester | Exposed to NTS | Self-reported through structured questionnaire; women (or their healthcare providers) called one of the 18 participating TIS because of question about exposure | Any major birth defect ascertained by each center through follow-up interview with the mother within a year of estimated date of delivery. | H2-receptor antagonists: 635; (lost to follow-up: 82; followed for pregnancy outcome: 553); NTS: 1,390 | H2-receptor antagonists: 13/553 (2.7%); NTS: 44/1,390 (3.5%) | Unadjusted RR (95% CI) for H2-receptor antagonist use at any time during pregnancy and any major birth defect: 0.78 (0.42 - 1.44) |
Jick et al. 198126* | United States (Washington, Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound), 1977-1979 | Triprolidine hydrochloride + pseudoephedrine hydrochloride; diphenhydramine; use during first trimester | Baseline risk in total cohort | Pharmacy records | Any major birth defect identified from hospital discharge codes; all potential cases had medical records review to confirm diagnosis | Total pregnancies: 6,837; triprolidine + pseudoephedrine: 384; diphenhydramine: 361 | Triprolidine + pseudoephedrine: 6/384 (16 per 1,000); diphenhydramine: 1/361 (3 per 1,000); baseline risk of birth defects: 11.7 per 1,000 (1.2%) | Not calculated |
Källén and Mottet, 200319 | Sweden, 1995-2001 | Meclizine; use during early pregnancy (~before 10-12 weeks gestation) | Unexposed to meclizine | Exposure during “early pregnancy” ascertained prospectively during prenatal care by midwives, typically by 10-12 weeks gestation | Spectrum of major birth defects ascertained through linkage with other national databases | Total pregnancies: 540,660 (549,569 infants); meclizine: 16,536 | Meclizine: 524/16,536 (3.16%); prevalence among unexposed not stated | Unadjusted OR (95% CI) for any birth defect identified in the Medical Birth Registry: 0.91 (0.83-0.99); table 6 shows observed/expected analyses (RRs and 95% CIs) for several selected defects; none are significantly elevated or decreased; potential signals for anal atresia (2.29; 0.99-4.50) and body wall defect (2.33; 0.94-4.81) |
Källén and Olausson, 200130‡ | Sweden, 1995-2001 | Loratadine; use during early pregnancy (~before 10-12 weeks gestation) | Baseline risk in total cohort | Exposure during “early pregnancy” ascertained prospectively during prenatal care by midwives; for cases, medical records were gathered to validate exposure though timing of loratadine use was not well-reported and unreliable. | Hypospadias as documented by ICD codes in the Swedish ; Registry of Congenital Malformations | Total pregnancies: 540,660 (549,569 infants); loratadine: 2,780 | Loratadine: 15/2,780 (0.5%) baseline hypospadias prevalence: 1/500; | Adjusted OR (95% CI) for association between loratadine exposure and hypospadias: 2.39 (1.43-3.38) if the twins were counted separately and 2.27 (1.33-3.87) if the twins were counted as a single occurrence. |
Källén and Olausson, 200631‡ | Sweden, 1995-2004 | Loratadine; use during early pregnancy (~before 10-12 weeks gestation) | Expected number of hypospadias cases in birth population exposed to loratadine | Exposure during “early pregnancy” ascertained prospectively during prenatal care typically by 10-12 weeks gestation by midwives | Hypospadias as documented by ICD codes in the Swedish Registry of Congenital Malformations and Hospital Discharge Register | Updating of 2001 analysis: loratadine (1995-2001): 2,780; loratadine (2002-2004): 1,911 | Prevalence of hypospadias among women exposed to loratadine: 1995-2001: 25/2,780 (0.9 %), 2002-2004: 2/1,911(0.1%), 1995-2004 combined: 27/4,691 (0.6%); expected number of hypospadias cases in birth population exposed to loratadine: 1995-2001:12.5, 2002-2004:4.3; 1995-2004 combined: 16.8. | Calculated ratio of observed to expected (95% CI) using an exact Poisson distribution; for re-analysis of 1995-2001 data: 2.0 (1.29-2.95); for 2002-2004: 0.47 (0.06-1.68); for 1995-2004: 1.61 (1.04-2.34) |
Källén, 199861 | Sweden, 1995-1996 | H2-receptor antagonists (included cimetidine, ranitidine, famotidine, nizatidine, cimetidine + famotidine, ranitidine + famotidine); use during early pregnancy (~before 10-12 weeks gestation) | Baseline risk in total cohort | Maternal self-report of medication used before first prenatal visit at 10-12 weeks gestation | Any major birth defect ascertained through linkages with several national registries | Acid-suppressing drugs: 547 pregnancies (553 infants); H2-antagonists only or H2-antagonists + proton pump inhibitors: 275 cimetidine (n=35), ranitidine (n=156), famotidine (n=58), nizatidine (n=3), cimetidine + famotidine (n=1), ranitidine + famotidine (n=2) | H2-receptor antagonists only: 6/255 (2.4%) Baseline birth defects prevalence: 3.9%; | Adjusted OR (95% CI) for H2-receptor antagonists use in first trimester and any major birth defect: 0.46 (0.17-1.20) |
Källén, 200212 | Sweden, 1995-1999 | Wide array of first and second generation H1 receptor antagonists (see paper table 1 for complete list); use during early pregnancy (~ before 10-12 weeks gestation) Note: all analyses conducted by indication (NVP or allergy), not by medication |
Baseline risk in total cohort | Exposure during “early pregnancy” ascertained prospectively during prenatal care by midwives (typically at 10-12 weeks gestation) | Spectrum of specific defects ascertained through linkage with other national databases | Total exposed pregnancies: 17,776 (18,197 infants) | Total birth defects among exposed: 579; NVP indication: 402; Allergy indication: 177 Baseline birth defects prevalence: 3.16%; | Unadjusted OR (95% CI); among those with NVP indication: association with all birth defects: 0.98 (0.89-1.09); “selected” major birth defects: 0.94 (0.83-1.07); congenital heart defects: 0.89 (0.71-1.11); specific congenital heart defects: 0.78 (0.60-1.01); among those with allergy indication: all birth defect: 1.03 (0.89-1.20); “selected” major birth defects: 1.06 (0.88-1.28); congenital heart defects: 0.89 (0.63-1.24); specific congenital heart defects: 0.81 (0.55-1.20) [Reported in paper table 5]; only association reported for a specific defect was for congenital hip subluxation (previously associated with promethazine [Kullander and Källén14]): 1.05 (0.83-1.32) for any antihistamine used for NVP and 0.77 (0.51-1.18) for any antihistamine used for allergy |
Kullander and Källén, 197614 | Sweden, 1963-1965 | Promethazine, diphenhydramine, and meclizine; any “anti-emetic”; use during first trimester | No antiemetic use | Self-report | Any major birth defect as ascertained by pediatrician and documented in medical records up to one year after birth | Total pregnancies: 6,376; pregnancies with infant follow-up: 5,753: antiemetics: 778; promethazine: 617; prochlorperazine: 91; diphenhydramine: 46; meclizine: 19; no antiemetics: 4,975 | Any antiemetic: 34/778 (4.4%); promethazine: 27/617 (4.4%); diphenhydramine: 3/46 (6.5%); meclizine: 0/19; no antiemetics: 166/4,975 (3.3%) (See table V for more detailed results) | Not calculated; authors noted increased risk of congenital diaphragmatic hernia associated with promethazine exposure |
Lalkin et al. 199865 | Canada, Italy (2) and France, Teratogen Information Services | “Histamine blockers”; any use during pregnancy [89% used in first trimester] Note: exposure of interest was omeprazole; exposure to “histamine blockers” was comparison exposure |
Exposed to NTS; unexposed matched to exposed on several potential confounders | Self-reported through structured questionnaire; women (or their healthcare providers) TIS because of question about exposure | Any major birth defect ascertained through maternal self-report during postnatal follow-up telephone interview | Exposure anytime during pregnancy: “Histamine blockers”: 113; NTS: 113 Exposure during first trimester and had live birth: “Histamine blockers”: 98; NTS: 66 | “Histamine blockers”: 3/98 (3.1%); NTS: 2/66 (3.0%) | Not calculated; there was no significant difference in prevalence of birth defects among those exposed and unexposed to medications during pregnancy |
Loebstein et al. 199932 | Canada (Motherisk) and Italy, Teratogen Information Services | Terfenadine; use during first trimester and entire pregnancy | Exposed to NTS; unexposed matched to exposed on several potential confounders | Self-reported through structured questionnaire; women (or their healthcare providers) called Canada or Italy TIS because of question about exposure | Any major birth defect ascertained through maternal self-report during postnatal follow-up telephone interview; outcomes of interest confirmed in writing by the child's pediatrician. | Terfenadine: 118 from both Canada (102) and Italy (16); first trimester exposure: 65; unexposed: 118 | Terfenadine: 0/65; unexposed: 2/111 (1.8%) | Matched RR (95% CI); association between first trimester terfenadine exposure and any major birth defect: 0.57 (0.06-5.39) |
Magee et al. 199662 | Canada Teratogen Information Service (Motherisk), 1985-1993 | H2-receptor antagonists (ranitidine, cimetidine, famotidine, nizatidine); use during first trimester | Exposed to NTS; unexposed matched to exposed on several potential confounders | Self-reported through structured questionnaire; women (or their healthcare providers) called TIS because of question about exposure. | Any major birth defect ascertained in interview with mother within one year after delivery | H2-receptor antagonists: 142 live births; NTS: 143 | H2-receptor antagonists: 3/142 (2.1%); NTS: 5/143 (3.5%) | Risk difference (95% CI) comparing frequency of birth defects among users of H2-receptor antagonists during the first trimester and NTS: −1.4% (−5.2%, 2.4%) |
Matok et al. 201063 | Israel (Southern District), 1998-2007 | H2-receptor antagonists (famotidine, ranitidine, cimetidine), alone and in combination; use during first trimester | Unexposed to H2-receptor antagonists (or to famotidine, ranitidine, or cimetidine) | Prescription records | Any major birth defect, excluding those with chromosomal malformations | Total pregnancies: 84,823; H2-receptor antagonists: 1,148; famotidine: 878; ranitidine: 276 | H2-receptor antagonist: 65/1,148 (5.7%) vs.unexposed to H2-receptor antagonist: 4,400/83,675 (5.3%); famotidine: 58/878 (6.6%) vs.unexposed to famotidine: 4,407/83,945 (5.2%); ranitidine: 6/276 (2.2%) vs. unexposed to ranitidine: 4,459/84,547 (5.3%) | Adjusted OR (95% CI) for association between H2-receptor antagonist use in the first trimester and major birth defects: any use: 1.03 (0.80-1.32); famotidine: 1.21 (0.92-1.58); ranitidine: not calculated (fewer than 7 birth defects noted) |
McBride, 196915 | Austraila (Sydney), 1956-1961 | Cyclizine; use during first trimester | Unexposed to cyclizine | Not stated | CPO | Total pregnancies: 25,333; first trimester use of cyclizine: 1,125; unexposed: 24,208; women with NVP and unexposed: 1,100 | CPO among first trimester users of cyclizine: 5/1125 (4.4/1,000); CPO among unexposed: 19/24,208 (0.78/1,000); CPO among women with NVP (and unexposed): 4/1,100 (3.64/1,000) | Not calculated; among individuals with NVP, there was no significant difference in prevalence of CPO among those exposed and unexposed to cyclizine in the first trimester |
Michaelis et al. 198324* | Germany, 1964-1972 | Miscellaneous antiemetics (meclizine, triflupromazine, dimenhydrinate, chlorpheniramine); use during first trimester | Unexposed to antiemetics; unexposed matched to exposed on several potential confounders | Self-report and report by physician | Major, minor, other abnormalities ascertained from pediatric records; suspected cases underwent clinical review by panel of physicians | Total pregnancies: 13,643; miscellaneous antiemetics: 628; unexposed: 628 | Miscellaneous antiemetics: 11/628; Unexposed: 12/628 | Matched OR (90% CI) for miscellaneous antiemetic use in the first trimester and any birth defect: 0.92 (90% CI: 0.42, 2.00) |
Milkovich and van den Berg, 197616† | United States (Northern California, Kaiser Permanente), 1959-1966 | Meclizine, cyclizine; use during first trimester use and throughout pregnancy | Women with NVP but no prescription for treatment of condition | Medical record reviewed to identify first trimester prescriptions | Any major birth defect | Total pregnancies: 11,481; use of meclizine in the first trimester: 613; use of cyclizine in the first trimester: 111; NVP but no prescription for NVP medications: 4,353 | Prevalence of birth defects identified by 1 month, 1 year and 5 years of age: Meclizine use in first trimester: 2.0%, 2.9%, 4.1%; cyclizine use in first trimester: 1.8%, 1.8%, 3.7%; among those with NVP but no medication use:1.5%, 2.2%, 3.2% | Not calculated; there were no significant differences in prevalence of birth defects comparing those with meclizine or cyclizine use in the first trimester with the unmedicated group |
Moretti et al. 200333 | Canada, Italy, Israel, Brazil Teratogen Information Services (dates not stated) | Loratadine; use during first trimester | NTS; unexposed matched to exposed on several potential confounders | Self-reported through structured questionnaire; women (or their healthcare providers) called TIS because of question about exposure | Any major birth defect ascertained through maternal self-report during postnatal follow-up telephone interview; outcomes of interest confirmed in writing by the child's pediatrician. | Total pregnancies: 322; loratadine: 161; NTS: 161 | Loratadine: 5/143 (3.5%); NTS: 6/150 (4.0%) | Not calculated by authors, p-value of 0.95 provided; RR (95% CI) for comparison of proportion of exposed and unexposed with major birth defect: 0.87 (0.26-2.91) (calculated via EpiSheet) |
Pastuszak et al. 199634 | Canada and United States (Philadelphia) Teratogen Information Services, 1989-1994 | Astemizole; use during first trimester | NTS; unexposed matched to exposed on several potential confounders | Self-reported through structured questionnaire; women (or their healthcare providers) called TIS because of question about exposure | Any major birth defect ascertained through maternal self-report during postnatal follow-up telephone interview | Astemizole: 114; NTS: 114 | Astemizole: 2/114 (1.8%) (one case of hypospadias and one case of spina bifida occulta); unexposed: 2/114 (1.8%) (one case of ventricular septal defect and one case of ocular myopathy) | Not calculated; there was no significant differences in prevalence of birth defects among those exposed and unexposed in the first trimester |
Ruigómez et al. 199964 | United Kingdom and Italy, 1991-1996 | Cimetidine, ranitidine; use from 30 days before LMP date to 100 days after the LMP date | Unexposed to cimetidine, ranitidine, or omeprazole | Ascertained from medical records (United Kingdom) or prescriptions (Italy); women receiving more than one acid-suppressing drug during the first trimester were excluded from analysis | Any major or minor birth defect identified through general practitioners' records (United Kingdom) or hospital discharge data (Italy) | In both cohorts combined: liveborn infants: 2,261; stillbirths: 20; cimetidine: 237; ranitidine: 330; unexposed: 1,575 | United Kingdom cohort: cimetidine: 9/227 (4%); ranitidine: 17/229 (7.4%), unexposed: 37/651 (5.7%); Italy cohort: cimetidine: 2/10 (20%); ranitidine: 3/101 (3%); unexposed: 27/924 (2.9%) | Adjusted RR (95% CI) for medication use in the first trimester and any birth defect (in both cohorts combined): cimetidine: 1.3 (0.7-2.6), ranitidine: 1.5 (0.9-2.6) |
Schatz et al. 199727 | United States (California, Kaiser-Permanente Prospective Study of Asthma During Pregnancy), 1978-1989 | Chlorpheniramine, tripelenamine or other antihistamine (not otherwise specified); use during first trimester and throughout pregnancy | Unexposed to chlorpheniramine tripelennamine, or other antihistamines; unexposed matched to exposed on several potential confounders | Maternal self-report at initial visit (< 28 weeks gestation) then daily diary for all medications through delivery | Any major birth defect ascertained from medical records | 824 women with and 678 women without asthma (total n = 1,502) who delivered a singleton birth later than 20 weeks' gestation and for whom complete information regarding medications taken during pregnancy was available; chlorpheniramine, tripelennamine, or other antihistamines used in first trimester: 321; unexposed: 1,175 | Chlorpheniramine, tripelennamine, or other antihistamines used in first trimester: 3.7%; unexposed: 5.5%; | Not calculated |
Shapiro et al. 197817 | United States (Collaborative Perinatal Project), 1959-1966 | Meclizine; use during first four lunar months | Not exposed to meclizine in the first four lunar months | Self-report | Any major birth defect | “Mother-child pairs”: 50,282; meclizine: 1,014; unexposed: 49,268 | Meclizine: 36/1,014 (3.6%); unexposed: 1,357/49,268 (2.8%) | Standardized RR (95% CI) for meclizine use in the first four lunar months of pregnancy and major malformations: 1.20 (0.90-1.61) [See paper table for specific organ systems -- significant association with eye and ear defects (2.79 (1.12-5.73)] |
Weber-Schoendorfer and Schaefer 200835 | Germany (Berlin Teratogen Information Service), 1992-2006 | Cetirizine; use during the first trimester | Exposed to NTS; unexposed matched to exposed on several potential confounders | Self-reported through structured questionnaire; women (or their healthcare providers) called TIS because of question about exposure | Any major birth defect, excluding genetic syndromes ascertained during postnatal questionnaire to the mother and/or physician 8 weeks after delivery | Cetirizine: 196; NTS: 1,686 | Cetirizine: 3/177 (1.7%); NTS: 24/1,521 (1.6%) | Unadjusted OR (95% CI) of the association of cetirizine use in the first trimester and any major birth defect: 1.07 (0.21-3.59) |
Yerushalmy and Milkovich, 196518† | United States (Northern California, Kaiser Permanente), 1960-1964 | Meclizines, cyclizines, OAN; medications prescribed during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy | No antinauseant drugs prescribed | Maternal self-report at time of first prenatal visit (2/3 report in the first trimester); record of prescribed medications in medical record | Any “severe” birth defect, and by organ systems -- see Table 3 in paper | Total pregnancies: 4,277; meclizines/ cyclizines: 315; OAN: 449; unexposed: 3,902 | Meclizines/cyclizines: 9/315 (3.2%); OAN: 11/449 (3.3%); unexposed: 101/3,902 (3.8%) | Not calculated; there were no significant differences in prevalence of birth defects among those exposed and unexposed to medications |
CI, confidence interval; CL/P, cleft lip with or without cleft palate; CPO, cleft palate only; LMP, last menstrual period; NTD, neural tube defects; NTS, nonteratogenic substances; NVP, nausea and vomiting of pregnancy; OAN, other antinauseant; OAH, other antihistamines; OR, odds ratio; RR, risk ratio; TIS, Teratogen Information Service
Manuscript reported results for doxylamine+pyridoxine which are not included in this systematic review
Overlapping data from Kaiser Permanente
Overlapping data from Swedish surveillance systems