Table 2.

Associations between the parental perceived physical environment and children’s physical activity in public recreation spaces inside our outside the neighborhood

	Bivariate associationsa				Final model (n = 463)b
	β ± SE	n	95%CI	OR	β ± SE	95%CI	OR
Land use mix diversity	0.155 ± 0.111	515	0.94; 1.45	1.17
Residential density	0.407 ± 0.181	473	1.05; 2.14	1.5	0.255 ± 0.184	0.90; 1.85	1.29
Street connectivity	0.019 ± 0.184	518	0.71; 1.46	1.02
Land use mix accessibility	0.366 ± 0.139	521	1.10; 1.89	1.44	0.139 ± 0.160	0.84; 1.57	1.15
Walk/cycle facilities	0.550 ± 0.169	520	1.25; 2.41	1.73	0.325 ± 0.192	0.95; 2.02	1.38
Aesthetics	0.067 ± 0.156	520	0.79; 1.45	1.07
Traffic safety	0.234 ± 0.163	518	0.92; 1.74	1.26
Crime safety	0.190 ± 0.152	518	0.90; 1.63	1.21
Recreation facilities	0.525 ± 0.123	508	1.33; 2.15	1.69	0.481 ± 0.139	1.23; 2.12	1.62
Having a garden (ref = no)	0.138 ± 0.290	521	0.65; 2.03	1.15

β multilevel bivariate linear regression coefficient, n number of children included in the analytical sample, SE standard error, CI confidence interval

Bold: p < 0.05

^aMultilevel logistic regression analyses were controlled for age, sex and family SES

^bMultilevel logistic regression analyses were controlled for age, sex and family SES and variables that were significantly related to public recreation spaces physical activity in the bivariate analyses