Table 3.

Associations between the parental perceived physical environment and children’s physical activity in the garden

	Bivariate associationsa				Final model (n = 393)b
	β ± SE	n	95%CI	OR	β ± SE	95%CI	OR
Land use mix diversity	−0.271 ± 0.123	393	0.60; 0.97	0.76	−0.176 ± 0.133	0.65; 1.09	0.84
Residential density	−0.470 ± 0.179	393	0.44; 0.89	0.63	−0.376 ± 0.193	0.47; 1.00	0.69
Street connectivity	−0.336 ± 0.197	392	0.49; 1.05	0.72
Land use mix accessibility	−0.163 ± 0.144	393	0.64; 1.13	0.85
Walk/cycle facilities	−0.279 ± 0.174	393	0.54; 1.06	0.76
Aesthetics	0.229 ± 0.177	393	0.89; 1.78	1.26
Traffic safety	−0.194 ± 0.178	391	0.58; 1.17	0.82
Crime safety	0.168 ± 0.171	391	0.85; 1.65	1.18
Recreation facilities	−0.191 ± 0.129	389	0.64; 1.06	0.83

β multilevel bivariate linear regression coefficient, n number of children included in the analytical sample (only children having a garden were included), SE standard error, CI confidence interval

Bold: p < 0.05

^aMultilevel logistic regression analyses were controlled for age, sex and family SES

^bMultilevel logistic regression analyses were controlled for age, sex and family SES and variables that were significantly related to garden physical activity in the bivariate analyses