Table 4.

Associations between the parental perceived physical environment and children’s physical activity in their neighborhood

	Bivariate associationsa				Final model (n = 504)b
	β ± SE	n	95%CI	OR	β ± SE	95%CI	OR
Land use mix diversity	0.046 ± 0.103	515	0.86; 1.28	1.05
Residential density	0.097 ± 0.157	472	0.81; 1.50	1.10
Street connectivity	−0.706 ± 0.172	519	0.35; 0.69	0.49	−0.736 ± 0.193	0.33; 0.70	0.47
Land use mix accessibility	0.516 ± 0.133	521	1.29; 2.17	1.68	0.533 ± 0.159	1.25; 2.33	1.70
Walk/cycle facilities	−0.082 ± 0.146	520	0.69; 1.23	0.92
Aesthetics	0.283 ± 0.146	520	1.00; 1.77	1.33
Traffic safety	0.667 ± 0.162	518	1.42; 2.67	1.95	0.104 ± 0.211	0.73; 1.68	1.11
Crime safety	0.856 ± 0.156	518	1.73; 3.20	2.35	0.631 ± 0.193	1.29; 2.74	1.88
Recreation facilities	0.282 ± 0.115	509	1.06; 1.66	1.33	0.088 ± 0.128	0.85; 1.43	1.09
Having a garden (ref = no)	0.160 ± 0.258	521	0.71; 1.95	1.17

β multilevel bivariate linear regression coefficient, n number of children included in the analytical sample, SE standard error, CI confidence interval

Bold: p < 0.05

^aMultilevel logistic regression analyses were controlled for age, sex and family SES

^bMultilevel logistic regression analyses were controlled for age, sex and family SES and variables that were significantly related to neighborhood physical activity in the bivariate analyses