Table 5.
Bivariate associationsa | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
β ± SE | n | 95%CI | OR | |
Land use mix diversity | −0.124 ± 0.131 | 437 | 0.68; 1.14 | 0.88 |
Residential density | 0.143 ± 0.197 | 395 | 0.78; 1.70 | 1.15 |
Street connectivity | 0.305 ± 0.207 | 437 | 0.90; 2.04 | 1.36 |
Land use mix accessibility | 0.121 ± 0.160 | 439 | 0.82; 1.54 | 1.13 |
Walk/cycle facilities | 0.236 ± 0.180 | 437 | 0.89; 1.80 | 1.27 |
Aesthetics | −0.140 ± 0.184 | 437 | 0.61; 1.25 | 0.87 |
Traffic safety | −0.035 ± 0.190 | 437 | 0.67; 1.40 | 0.97 |
Crime safety | −0.223 ± 0.180 | 437 | 0.56; 1.14 | 0.80 |
Recreation facilities | −0.236 ± 0.139 | 433 | 0.60; 1.04 | 0.79 |
Having a garden (ref = no) | 0.240 ± 0.318 | 441 | 0.68; 2.37 | 1.27 |
β multilevel bivariate linear regression coefficient, n number of children included in the analytical sample, SE standard error, CI confidence interval
aMultilevel logistic regression analyses were controlled for age, sex and family SES