. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.

Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015 Mar 2;62(7):1805–1817. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2404809

Table 3.

Comparison of performances of different variants of our proposed method.

Modality	Method	ACC %	SEN %	SPE %	AUC	p-value
Multi-modality (MRI+CSF+PET)	DTSVM	69.4	64.3	73.5	0.736	<0.0001
	DTSS+DTSVM	71.3	84.0	61.4	0.755	<0.0001
	DTFS+DTSVM	76.5	81.2	71.9	0.836	<0.0010
	Proposed	79.4	84.5	72.7	0.848	-
MRI	DTSVM	63.3	59.8	66.0	0.700	<0.0001
	DTSS+DTSVM	65.6	66.2	65.3	0.686	<0.0001
	DTFS+DTSVM	69.4	72.0	67.3	0.743	<0.0010
	Proposed	73.4	74.3	72.1	0.764	-
CSF	DTSVM	66.2	60.3	70.8	0.701	<0.0500
CSF	Proposed (DTSS+DTSVM)	67.6	74.6	61.5	0.715	-
PET	DTSVM	67.0	59.6	72.7	0.732	<0.0100
	DTSS+DTSVM	68.1	72.9	60.8	0.726	<0.0010
	DTFS+DTSVM	68.7	81.0	59.0	0.733	<0.0500
	Proposed	71.6	76.4	67.9	0.741	-