Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 4;81(13):4432–4441. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01097-15

TABLE 1.

Sample description, numbers of sequences and OTUs, and diversity indices of datasets analyzed

Sample collection site Sample
Data seta
No. of sequences No. of OTUs
Rarefaction rank
Good's coverage index
Simpson index
Shannon index
Avg Bray-Curtis index
Name Description Salinity (%) 0.03 0.06 0.03 0.06 0.03 0.06 0.03 0.06 0.03 0.06 0.03 0.06
Chott El-Djerid S1 Salt crust 37 617 53 25 2 1.5 0.94 0.98 0.07 0.15 3.20 2.34 0.22 0.36
S2 Salt crust 37 322 12 8 1 1.5 0.96 0.98 0.2 0.24 1.74 1.57 0.18 0.26
S3 Salt crust 37 3,956 668 132 6 4 0.88 0.99 0.02 0.11 5.28 3.22 0.14 0.26
S4 Sediment 37 455 74 34 7.5 7 0.88 0.96 0.06 0.09 3.52 2.77 0.19 0.30
S5 Sediment 13.1 1,845 56 23 13 13 0.97 1.00 0.10 0.13 3.06 2.47 0.20 0.33
S6 Sediment 13.4 1,927 317 139 11.5 10 0.84 0.94 0.02 0.05 4.77 3.57 0.23 0.37
S7 Sediment 10.5 1,766 143 39 15 14 0.93 0.99 0.03 0.08 3.93 2.88 0.22 0.37
S10 Water 30 743 324 111 4 6 0.66 0.92 0.01 0.04 5.21 3.76 0.18 0.33
S11 Salt crust 37 1,363 297 86 5 4 0.85 0.98 0.02 0.06 4.93 3.41 0.25 0.38
S12 Salt crust 37 6,543 414 164 3 4 0.92 0.97 0.06 0.13 3.98 2.72 0.15 0.22
Sebkhet Douz S13 Water 9.4 8,284 515 129 11.5 15 0.93 0.99 0.02 0.06 4.78 3.30 0.12 0.20
S14 Sediment 6.7 522 62 31 18.5 18.5 0.89 0.96 0.09 0.12 3.18 2.57 0.11 0.18
S15 Sediment 14.1 1,959 355 91 7.5 10 0.87 0.98 0.02 0.10 4.89 3.20 0.16 0.31
S16 Biofilm 2.9 108 12 7 22.5 23 0.91 0.99 0.21 0.26 1.84 1.51 0.08 0.10
S17 Sediment 2.7 695 55 24 22.5 20 0.96 0.99 0.06 0.10 3.36 2.59 0.13 0.23
S18 Sediment 13.7 4,520 1,512 283 9.5 10 0.76 0.97 0.01 0.11 6.33 3.44 0.14 0.27
S19 Sediment 2.2 1,532 303 107 20 21 0.85 0.96 0.02 0.05 4.82 3.57 0.17 0.30
Sebkhet El-Melah S40 Sediment 7.6 402 132 51 14 17 0.75 0.94 0.04 0.10 4.10 2.97 0.06 0.1
S42 Sediment 10.8 5,287 485 103 9.5 12 0.92 0.99 0.03 0.10 4.56 2.80 0.06 0.1
Chott El-Fejej S26 Sediment 6.6 588 177 66 21 18.5 0.81 0.95 0.03 0.09 4.41 3.16 0.22 0.35
S27 Sediment 5.5 325 50 27 17 22 0.89 0.97 0.06 0.10 3.25 2.68 0.17 0.31
S28 Sediment 6.3 243 110 39 18.5 16 0.66 0.94 0.02 0.08 4.31 3.00 0.19 0.32
S29 Sediment 12.7 3,133 735 228 16 8 0.82 0.95 0.02 0.12 5.41 3.30 0.09 0.15
a

Rarefaction curves were used at both 97% (species level [0.03]) and 94% (genus level [0.06]) to rank the diversity of the samples. Samples whose rarefaction curves lie at the top are considered more diverse than samples whose rarefaction curves lie at the bottom. Samples were given diversity rankings ranging from the least diverse (rank 1) to the most diverse (rank 23). Good's coverage index, the Shannon index of sample diversity, and the Simpson index of sample evenness are shown at both the species (0.03) and genus (0.06) levels. The Bray-Curtis index of β diversity between samples was calculated for all possible pairwise comparisons for samples from each site. The average Bray-Curtis index is shown at both the species (0.03) and genus (0.06) levels.